2022
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Default mode network scaffolds immature frontoparietal network in cognitive development

Abstract: The default mode network (DMN) is a workspace for convergence of internal and external information. The frontal parietal network (FPN) is indispensable to executive functioning. Yet, how they interplay to support cognitive development remains elusive. Using longitudinal developmental fMRI with an n-back paradigm, we show a heterogeneity of maturational changes in multivoxel activity and network connectivity among DMN and FPN nodes in 528 children and 103 young adults. Compared with adults, children exhibited p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative explanation for this result could have to do with the interplay between default mode and frontoparietal networks. The default mode network has been proposed to serve as a compensatory scaffold to support executive functions in children and young adults with immature frontoparietal network 42 . Importantly, while there are suggestions of the growth patterns resembling gradient 2 proposed by Guell and colleagues, the depiction of the gradients using the LittleBrain toolbox in the current study is inconclusive, mainly due to divergent patterns in the anatomical parcellations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative explanation for this result could have to do with the interplay between default mode and frontoparietal networks. The default mode network has been proposed to serve as a compensatory scaffold to support executive functions in children and young adults with immature frontoparietal network 42 . Importantly, while there are suggestions of the growth patterns resembling gradient 2 proposed by Guell and colleagues, the depiction of the gradients using the LittleBrain toolbox in the current study is inconclusive, mainly due to divergent patterns in the anatomical parcellations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the left frontoparietal network mainly involves speech, semantic recognition, and cognition (Marek & Dosenbach, 2018 ; Vendetti & Bunge, 2014 ). Numerous neuroimaging studies have shown that abnormal right frontoparietal network activity might be closely related to impaired working memory and attention deficits (Becker et al., 2022 ; Chen et al., 2023 ; Letkiewicz et al., 2022 ; May & Kana, 2020 ; Tan et al., 2021 ; Yuk et al., 2020 ; Zhou et al., 2023 ). A previous neuroimaging meta‐analysis also dedicated that clinical patients with emotional regulation disorders exhibited reduced activity in the right frontoparietal network and compensatory activation of emotion‐related brain areas, such as the insula and temporal gyrus (Pico‐Perez et al., 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shown that abnormal right frontoparietal network activity might be closely related to impaired working memory and attention deficits (Becker et al, 2022;Chen et al, 2023;Letkiewicz et al, 2022;May & Kana, 2020;Tan et al, 2021;Yuk et al, 2020;Zhou et al, 2023).…”
Section: Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between DMN and FPN is more cooperative than competitive ( 55 , 56 ), and contributes to the completion of tasks ( 56 , 57 ), memory search ( 58 ), and faster memory retrieval ( 59 ). Aberrant connectivity between two networks is often indicative of disruption of well-organized cognitive control processes, which may well head to widespread cognitive dysfunction ( 60 , 61 ). The pattern of increased ipDMN-rFPN connectivity we observe here reflects less efficient cognitive processing in patients with insulinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%