2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defaunation and changes in climate and fire frequency have synergistic effects on aboveground biomass loss in the brazilian savanna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that seed dispersal is critical for species to shift ranges with climate changes (Dawson et al, 2011;Corlett and Westcott, 2013;González-Varo et al, 2021;Fricke et al, 2022), the relative lack of theoretical or empirical studies on this topic suggests SDD disruption due to climate change is an area requiring additional focus. We posit that advancing knowledge in this regard is particularly urgent given the omnipresent impact of climate change, which operates at a higher (i.e., global) scale and could thus worsen the consequences of any other driver of SDD (McConkey et al, 2012;Zhou et al, 2013;Maciel et al, 2021). For instance, one of the latest studies showed that the loss of seed dispersal interactions may impair the potential of a palm species to track climate change, especially in combination with fragmentation and forest loss (Sales et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that seed dispersal is critical for species to shift ranges with climate changes (Dawson et al, 2011;Corlett and Westcott, 2013;González-Varo et al, 2021;Fricke et al, 2022), the relative lack of theoretical or empirical studies on this topic suggests SDD disruption due to climate change is an area requiring additional focus. We posit that advancing knowledge in this regard is particularly urgent given the omnipresent impact of climate change, which operates at a higher (i.e., global) scale and could thus worsen the consequences of any other driver of SDD (McConkey et al, 2012;Zhou et al, 2013;Maciel et al, 2021). For instance, one of the latest studies showed that the loss of seed dispersal interactions may impair the potential of a palm species to track climate change, especially in combination with fragmentation and forest loss (Sales et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the large amount of information dealing with the effects of SDD, biases in scientific research can limit our understanding of the actual main patterns of SDD at a global scale. Moreover, most studies focus on just one global change driver, when it is widely accepted that such drivers act synergistically on many processes (Tylianakis et al, 2008;González-Varo et al, 2013;Maciel et al, 2021). A previous study by McConkey et al (2012) pointed out that such synergistic interactions between different types of disturbances could exacerbate the negative impacts on seed dispersal, although they were rarely examined (but see Portela and Dirzo, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the literature on seed dispersal is focused on the dispersal syndrome hypothesis (DSH) or co-adapted syndrome, which states that fruits and dispersal vectors co-evolved (mutualistic interactions) influencing the foraging strategies of dispersers (e.g., [ 9 ]). A large amount of information focuses on only one environmental change driver (e.g., habitat fragmentation) affecting the seed dispersal processes (e.g., [ 10 ]). Although there are overwhelming theoretical studies on the enumeration or assessment of dispersal vectors of a particular group of plants (e.g., [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]), information on how the dispersal mechanisms of many plants evolve in a changing environment remains scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%