2018 IEEE Applied Signal Processing Conference (ASPCON) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/aspcon.2018.8748670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defect Classification of Printed Circuit Boards based on Transfer Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultimately, they achieved a detection accuracy of 98.4% on the DeepPCB dataset using only 50 labeled samples. Ghosh et al, performed transfer learning using a pre-trained Inception-V3 model [5]. They extracted the mid-level neural network of Inception-V3 as the front half of the defect detection network and an adaptation network as the back half of the detection network.…”
Section: Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, they achieved a detection accuracy of 98.4% on the DeepPCB dataset using only 50 labeled samples. Ghosh et al, performed transfer learning using a pre-trained Inception-V3 model [5]. They extracted the mid-level neural network of Inception-V3 as the front half of the defect detection network and an adaptation network as the back half of the detection network.…”
Section: Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In stacked autoencoder, the cross entropy loss function is applied to deal with the optimization problem, which is mathematically determined in Eq. (12).…”
Section: Dimensionality Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this, a high level multiple dimensional classification techniques such as random forest, support vector machine, etc. are employed for identifying the defect samples [12]. Whereas, the success of the classification techniques completely depends on the human experts for extracting and selecting the representative feature values based on the structure variations and local gray level variations of a defect in the test PCB defective image [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%