2002
DOI: 10.1117/12.474479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defect printability of alternating phase-shift mask: a critical comparison of simulation and experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most prominent one is AIMS TM [1][2][3][4], most commonly used for final qualification of reticles after repair. AIMS TM is considered a reliable tool for defect dispositioning and many studies in the past have shown compatibility between printability and AIMS TM imaging [1].…”
Section: Inspection Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most prominent one is AIMS TM [1][2][3][4], most commonly used for final qualification of reticles after repair. AIMS TM is considered a reliable tool for defect dispositioning and many studies in the past have shown compatibility between printability and AIMS TM imaging [1].…”
Section: Inspection Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prominent one is AIMS TM [1][2][3][4], most commonly used for final qualification of reticles after repair. AIMS TM is considered a reliable tool for defect dispositioning and many studies in the past have shown compatibility between printability and AIMS TM imaging [1]. AIMS TM is an optical review tool, used to re-create the aerial image that will be created by the stepper when exposing the reticle in the wafer fab -employing similar numerical aperture and sigma settings (projection and illumination apertures) as would be used in the wafer exposure.…”
Section: Inspection Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%