1981
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-52-2-245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defective Interfering Particles of Fixed Rabies Viruses: Lack of Correlation with Attenuation or Auto-interference in Mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Little is known about the role of DI viruses during natural infections although it has been pointed out that they have the capacity to ameliorate virulent infection or cause infections to become persistent (Huang & Baltimore, 1970;Dimmock, 1985;Barrett & Dimmock, 1986). In vivo laboratory infections with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) Holland & Villarreal, 1975;Rabinowitz et al, 1977;Crick & Brown, 1977;Fultz et al, 1981Fultz et al, , 1982a, rabies virus (Wiktor et al, 1977;Clark et al, 1981), reovirus (Spandidos & Graham, 1976), influenza virus (Bernkopf, 1950;yon Magnus, 1951 ;Gamboa et al, 1976;Rabinowitz & Huprikar, 1979), lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (Welsh et al, 1977), Banzi virus (Smith, 1981), and Rift Valley fever virus (Mires, 1956) show that DI viruses do indeed exert a sparing effect, but it is uncertain that this is due to the interfering activity of the DI virus as no 'inactive' virus was used to control for stimulation of immune responses by DI virus antigen. Nonetheless, carefully controlled experiments using inactivated viral antigen in place of DI virus with VSV (Jones & Holland, 1980;Fultz et al, 1982 a) and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Dimmock & Kennedy, 1978;Crouch et al, 1982;Barrett & Dimmock, 1984a, b; showed that DI viruses are indeed powerful modulators of infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little is known about the role of DI viruses during natural infections although it has been pointed out that they have the capacity to ameliorate virulent infection or cause infections to become persistent (Huang & Baltimore, 1970;Dimmock, 1985;Barrett & Dimmock, 1986). In vivo laboratory infections with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) Holland & Villarreal, 1975;Rabinowitz et al, 1977;Crick & Brown, 1977;Fultz et al, 1981Fultz et al, , 1982a, rabies virus (Wiktor et al, 1977;Clark et al, 1981), reovirus (Spandidos & Graham, 1976), influenza virus (Bernkopf, 1950;yon Magnus, 1951 ;Gamboa et al, 1976;Rabinowitz & Huprikar, 1979), lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (Welsh et al, 1977), Banzi virus (Smith, 1981), and Rift Valley fever virus (Mires, 1956) show that DI viruses do indeed exert a sparing effect, but it is uncertain that this is due to the interfering activity of the DI virus as no 'inactive' virus was used to control for stimulation of immune responses by DI virus antigen. Nonetheless, carefully controlled experiments using inactivated viral antigen in place of DI virus with VSV (Jones & Holland, 1980;Fultz et al, 1982 a) and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Dimmock & Kennedy, 1978;Crouch et al, 1982;Barrett & Dimmock, 1984a, b; showed that DI viruses are indeed powerful modulators of infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixed rabies virus strains differ greatly in their lethality for adult mice, and the factors governing the regulation of rabies virus pathogenicity appear to be diverse and variable, depending on virus growth conditions and virus strain (1)(2)(3)(4). In other virus systems, the virion structural proteins have been identified as determinants in pathogenicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DI VSV preparations of defined particle length show differences in their abilities to induce the synthesis of interferon (Marcus & Sekellick, 1977), modulate infection in mice (Jones & Holland, 1980) and to autointerfere (Rao & Huang, 1982). Similarly, the in vivo properties of rabies virus in mice are variable (Clark et al, 1981). However, as yet there has been no systematic study of the biological activities of DI viruses in any system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%