“…Little is known about the role of DI viruses during natural infections although it has been pointed out that they have the capacity to ameliorate virulent infection or cause infections to become persistent (Huang & Baltimore, 1970;Dimmock, 1985;Barrett & Dimmock, 1986). In vivo laboratory infections with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) Holland & Villarreal, 1975;Rabinowitz et al, 1977;Crick & Brown, 1977;Fultz et al, 1981Fultz et al, , 1982a, rabies virus (Wiktor et al, 1977;Clark et al, 1981), reovirus (Spandidos & Graham, 1976), influenza virus (Bernkopf, 1950;yon Magnus, 1951 ;Gamboa et al, 1976;Rabinowitz & Huprikar, 1979), lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (Welsh et al, 1977), Banzi virus (Smith, 1981), and Rift Valley fever virus (Mires, 1956) show that DI viruses do indeed exert a sparing effect, but it is uncertain that this is due to the interfering activity of the DI virus as no 'inactive' virus was used to control for stimulation of immune responses by DI virus antigen. Nonetheless, carefully controlled experiments using inactivated viral antigen in place of DI virus with VSV (Jones & Holland, 1980;Fultz et al, 1982 a) and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Dimmock & Kennedy, 1978;Crouch et al, 1982;Barrett & Dimmock, 1984a, b; showed that DI viruses are indeed powerful modulators of infection.…”