2023
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c01336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defects Tune the Strong Metal–Support Interactions in Copper Supported on Defected Titanium Dioxide Catalysts for CO2 Reduction

Abstract: A highly active and stable Cu-based catalyst for CO2 to CO conversion was demonstrated by creating a strong metal–support interaction (SMSI) between Cu active sites and the TiO2-coated dendritic fibrous nano-silica (DFNS/TiO2) support. The DFNS/TiO2–Cu10 catalyst showed excellent catalytic performance with a CO productivity of 5350 mmol g–1 h–1 (i.e., 53,506 mmol gCu –1 h–1), surpassing that of almost all copper-based thermal catalysts, with 99.8% selectivity toward CO. Even after 200 h of reaction, the cataly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our recent work further demonstrated that the r-WGSR would be inhibited over CuCeO x /TiO 2 by the partial coating of the Cu surface with TiO x adlayers generated by a strong metal−support interaction effect (SMSI) between Cu and TiO 2 . 10,51,52 SSITKA-DRIFTS/ MS results are also consistent with this conclusion since a low coverage of CO intermediates is obtained when dividing N CO by the total number of surface Cu sites (i.e., θ CO,Cu = 0.0025, Table 2), therefore, suggesting that the copper nanoparticles are (i) being blocked by the SMSI between Cu and TiO 2 and (ii) being partially occupied by spectator formates.…”
Section: R-wgsr + Co Hydrogenation Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In addition, our recent work further demonstrated that the r-WGSR would be inhibited over CuCeO x /TiO 2 by the partial coating of the Cu surface with TiO x adlayers generated by a strong metal−support interaction effect (SMSI) between Cu and TiO 2 . 10,51,52 SSITKA-DRIFTS/ MS results are also consistent with this conclusion since a low coverage of CO intermediates is obtained when dividing N CO by the total number of surface Cu sites (i.e., θ CO,Cu = 0.0025, Table 2), therefore, suggesting that the copper nanoparticles are (i) being blocked by the SMSI between Cu and TiO 2 and (ii) being partially occupied by spectator formates.…”
Section: R-wgsr + Co Hydrogenation Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…(c) A proposed mechanism for CO 2 reduction to CO on TiO 2 ‐coated dendritic fibrous nano‐silica supported Cu catalysts. Reprinted with permission from [84] . Copyright American Chemical Society, 2023.…”
Section: Strong Metal‐support Interaction In Photocatalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The catalytic activity remained stable after five testing cycles (Figure 11b). A recent study has reported strong metal‐supported interaction on TiO 2 ‐supported Cu catalyst and its use in CO 2 reduction reaction [84] . TiO 2 support partially encapsulated and induced SMSI overlayer around Cu active sites where Ti 3+ species found them strongly bond with copper atoms, accompanying with defective oxygen vacancies on TiO 2 surface.…”
Section: Strong Metal‐support Interaction In Photocatalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…44 It is worth noting that the aggregation of iron nanostructures and the insufficient exposure of active sites caused by high surface magnetism can be effectively addressed through the SMSI between Fe active sites and support materials. 45,46 In this work, we developed a universal strategy that can load Fe NPs on the surface of a series of carbon-based or metal-based supports (such as graphite felt (GF), carbon cloth (CC), carbon paper (CP), copper foam (CF), nickel foam (NF), and iron foam (IF)) to obtain self-supported Fe/support catalysts. The strong interaction between Fe NPs and GF is conducive to increasing the exposure of iron active sites and stability, which shows high electrocatalytic NO 3 RR performance with a 67.7% NO 3 − conversion rate and a 96.6% N 2 selectivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%