2021
DOI: 10.1002/ett.4271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defending co‐resident attack using reputation‐based virtual machine deployment policy in cloud computing

Abstract: Cloud computing enables users to utilize IT resources conveniently with low‐level cost, but it also brings some new threats. The co‐resident attack is one of the typical examples, where malicious users steal information from legal users by starting a virtual machine (VM) and building a side‐channel between VMs on the same server. Most of current studies focus mainly on defending the side‐channel attack, which requires modifications to the existing underlying architecture of cloud platforms. Some studies focus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature [11] proposed a dynamic VM deployment strategy that utilizes a multi-objective optimization algorithm to deploy and adjust VMs dynamically. The literature [12] proposed a reputation-based VM deployment strategy to reduce the risk of coexistence attacks by evaluating the reputation of VMs and deploying VMs with high reputations on the same physical host. The literature [13] compared the impact of different VM deployment policies on the efficiency of data processing centers through simulation experiments, and he concluded that different VM deployment policies significantly affect the performance and resource utilization efficiency of data processing centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature [11] proposed a dynamic VM deployment strategy that utilizes a multi-objective optimization algorithm to deploy and adjust VMs dynamically. The literature [12] proposed a reputation-based VM deployment strategy to reduce the risk of coexistence attacks by evaluating the reputation of VMs and deploying VMs with high reputations on the same physical host. The literature [13] compared the impact of different VM deployment policies on the efficiency of data processing centers through simulation experiments, and he concluded that different VM deployment policies significantly affect the performance and resource utilization efficiency of data processing centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good example is cross side-channel attacks that exploit isolation vulnerabilities to cross the logical boundaries separating VMs sharing the same physical host resources. Attackers usually exploit their presence on the same host hosting the victim’s virtual machine, construct a side-channel attack and access sensitive data [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloud computing allows consumers to access IT resources quickly and at a cheap cost, but it also introduces certain new dangers. One such example is the co‐resident attack, in which malevolent users launch a virtual machine (VM) and create a side‐channel between VMs on the same server to steal information from legitimate users 3 . Although the cloud computing paradigm accommodates large quantities of IoT clusters data, the transmission of large quantities of data from and to cloud computers is a problem as bandwidth is small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such example is the co-resident attack, in which malevolent users launch a virtual machine (VM) and create a side-channel between VMs on the same server to steal information from legitimate users. 3 Although the cloud computing paradigm accommodates large quantities of IoT clusters data, the transmission of large quantities of data from and to cloud computers is a problem as bandwidth is small. The processing of data near the data source is therefore important and fog computing offers a promising solution to that problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%