2003
DOI: 10.1680/wame.2003.156.2.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining a network of benchmark catchments for the UK

Abstract: A network of benchmark catchments has been selected to improve the ability to identify and interpret hydrological trends throughout the UK. The designation of this network is examined within the context of a wider review of the gauging station network designed to address a broad range of strategic hydrological needs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar responses in flood peaks have been reported elsewhere (e.g. Bree and Cunnane, 1979;Bailey and Bree, 1981;Lynn, 1981). Likewise, Wilcock and Wilcock (1995) examined the impacts of arterial drainage on the river Maine in Northern Ireland and found systematic increases in high flows.…”
Section: Arterial and Field Drainagesupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar responses in flood peaks have been reported elsewhere (e.g. Bree and Cunnane, 1979;Bailey and Bree, 1981;Lynn, 1981). Likewise, Wilcock and Wilcock (1995) examined the impacts of arterial drainage on the river Maine in Northern Ireland and found systematic increases in high flows.…”
Section: Arterial and Field Drainagesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Contemporary surface water abstraction within the Boyne catchment upstream from Slane Castle, as estimated by EPA (2009), is ∼ 8 % of the 1952-2009 Q95 (flow equalled or exceeded for 95 % of the time) and is therefore considered too insignificant to impact the natural flow regime (Bradford and Marsh, 2003). Change in potential evapotranspiration (PET) (WH 9) was also assessed using estimated PET derived for Dublin Airport, which is the closest synoptic station (38 km south-east of Slane Castle streamflow gauging station) with data covering the period of study.…”
Section: Overview Of Potential Drivers Of Hydrological Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…River flow influences water temperatures, so it is important to be able to discount the effect of human activities such as water abstractions or heated discharges from power stations for example. In the UK, truly ‘pristine’ catchments are extremely rare, but the benchmark catchments have only minimal influence of human disturbance on their flow regimes (Bradford and Marsh, ). As such, any river temperature trends in benchmark catchments are unlikely to be the result of direct human‐induced modification of flow regimes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 2773 sites, we selected a subset of 231 sites (predominantly spot sampled) located within 63 ‘benchmark catchments’. These catchments are subject to only minimal impacts on the flow regime, and there have been no known major land use changes that might cause systematic hydrological changes (Bradford and Marsh, ; Hannaford and Marsh, , ). The benchmark catchments cover most of the country and are representative of the range of rivers across England and Wales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these two catchments are the most affected, many of the other catchments are also subject to varying degrees of human influence. However, 31 of the catchments are part of the so called benchmark network (Bradford and Marsh 2003) and are relatively undisturbed.…”
Section: Data and Catchment Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%