CMAJ, April 1, 2014, 186(6) 425 O ur population is aging, and older patients are living longer with chronic illness. Technology-laden end-of-life care is associated with poorer quality of life, lower satisfaction with care and increased anxiety and depression for family members.1 Ad vance care planning can increase the quality of life of dying patients, improve the experience of family members and decrease health care costs.
1-3Advance care planning is a process by which patients consider options for future health care decisions and identify their wishes. These decisions and wishes can vary depending on the setting. For example, during an acute stay in hospital, the plan may pertain to the goals of care for the current stay in addition to any care that may be required after discharge. In other settings, the plan may result in an advance care directive -a verbal or written instruction de scribing what kind of care a patient would want (or not want) if he or she were no longer able to speak for him or herself, and the values that guide the patient in making important health care decisions. Advance care planning may also result in the nomination of a substitute decision-maker -someone who makes decisions for the pa tient if the patient is incapable of doing so.Patients in hospital with serious illness and their family members have identified improvements in end-of-life communication and decision-making as high-priority targets for quality improvement; 4,5 however, hospital-based health care providers infrequently engage patients and families in such conversations.6 Accordingly, the focus of our review is to provide guidance for advance care planning as it pertains to the inpatient setting (i.e., determination of goals of care for the patient in hospital). Although health care providers in the outpatient setting (e.g., family physicians, consultant physicians) play a key role in advance care planning, hospital-based providers share this responsibility. In fact, a stay in hospital presents an important opportunity for engaging in discussions about goals of care, because it signals a change in the trajectory of the patient's illness, giving in creased relevance to these conversations, and because potential substitute decision-makers (e.g., the most involved family members) are often present.To organize our review, we use a communication and decision-making framework consisting of the following components: identifying patients at high risk of dying who need to have a discussion about goals of care; information exchange (regarding prognosis, values, and the risks and expected outcomes of various treatment options); and reaching a decision through discussion and deliberation.7 By providing structured guidance, specific advice and practical tools, our aim is to increase clinicians' confidence in engaging in meaningful end-of-life communication with patients in hospital and their family members. To inform this review, we drew on a broad range of evidence, from expert opinion to randomized controlled trials and systematic...