2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the healthy "core microbiome" of oral microbial communities

Abstract: BackgroundMost studies examining the commensal human oral microbiome are focused on disease or are limited in methodology. In order to diagnose and treat diseases at an early and reversible stage an in-depth definition of health is indispensible. The aim of this study therefore was to define the healthy oral microbiome using recent advances in sequencing technology (454 pyrosequencing).ResultsWe sampled and sequenced microbiomes from several intraoral niches (dental surfaces, cheek, hard palate, tongue and sal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

97
888
6
25

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,042 publications
(1,016 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
97
888
6
25
Order By: Relevance
“…For each sample, different reference databases gave similar relative proportions of the six major phyla (that is, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Spirochaetes). Among different hosts, these six major phyla constituted the club of predominant oral residents, consistent with previous 16S rRNA gene-based community profiling surveys (Keijser et al, 2008;Zaura et al, 2009;Ling et al, 2010). However, the relative abundance of the predominant phyla differed among human hosts.…”
Section: Saliva Microbiomes Distinguish Caries-active Hosts F Yang Et Alsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For each sample, different reference databases gave similar relative proportions of the six major phyla (that is, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Spirochaetes). Among different hosts, these six major phyla constituted the club of predominant oral residents, consistent with previous 16S rRNA gene-based community profiling surveys (Keijser et al, 2008;Zaura et al, 2009;Ling et al, 2010). However, the relative abundance of the predominant phyla differed among human hosts.…”
Section: Saliva Microbiomes Distinguish Caries-active Hosts F Yang Et Alsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Among the 26 healthy and 19 caries-active hosts, only 0.53% and 0.08% species-level OTUs were shared, respectively. This finding contrasted with a recent report supporting the concept of a core microbiome, in which saliva microbiomes from three healthy Caucasian male adults shared 387 (47%) of 818 total OTUs (Zaura et al, 2009). The overly stringent read-selection criterion, as discussed above, could have led to this conclusion, where oral ecosystem could have been oversimplified by neglecting the 'rare phylotypes'.…”
Section: Saliva Microbiomes Distinguish Caries-active Hosts F Yang Et Alcontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier studies using cloning and Sanger sequencing (Kumar et al, 2005(Kumar et al, , 2006 suffered from the shallowness of the sequencing effort; it simply wasn't economically possible to obtain enough sequence information to plumb the complexity of the system. The advent of 454 pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes has allowed the collection of thousands of sequences per sample (Keijser et al, 2008;Zaura et al, 2009), and provides the power to comprehensively study bacterial community composition at the level of species. We used this technique to compare samples from patients with periodontitis and healthy controls, to further our understanding of bacterial ecology in this disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zo vormen de omstandigheden in de mond een ideale voedingsbodem voor het ontstaan van een zeer complexe microbiota, die meer dan 1.000 verschillende soorten bacteriën, schimmels en virussen omvat (Zaura et al, 2009). Het aantal bacteriën in de mond wordt geschat op 10 8 -10 9 .…”
Section: Verschillende Rollen Van Speekselunclassified