2002
DOI: 10.1006/ijna.2002.1022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining 'underwater cultural heritage'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wrecks can be valuable assets of cultural heritage, education, economy and tourism (Delgado, 1988), and can contain anthropological, archaeological, historical, cultural and social values (Edney, 2018). Wrecks are an important component of underwater culture, and are fragile, finite resources (Forrest, 2002). They cannot be transformed back to their original state, and unlike reefs, they cannot be renewed when disturbed or damaged (Scott-Ireton, 2005).…”
Section: Special Interest In Wreck Divingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wrecks can be valuable assets of cultural heritage, education, economy and tourism (Delgado, 1988), and can contain anthropological, archaeological, historical, cultural and social values (Edney, 2018). Wrecks are an important component of underwater culture, and are fragile, finite resources (Forrest, 2002). They cannot be transformed back to their original state, and unlike reefs, they cannot be renewed when disturbed or damaged (Scott-Ireton, 2005).…”
Section: Special Interest In Wreck Divingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage, it is useful to clarify the very essence of UCH, being defined as a non - renewable resource comprising a set of tangible and intangible heritage items that are linked to past or present human activities in the sea [ 9 ]. More specifically, UCH is understood as the archaeological heritage which is in, or has been removed from, an underwater environment; and includes submerged sites and structures, wreck sites, and wreckage and their archaeological and natural context [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research efforts so far also seem to have placed much more attention to study and document, preserve and protect inland CH monuments; and put them in a spatial planning context, compared to UCH [2]. As a result, UCH such as remnants of cities and civilizations, sites of archaeological interest, sunk martial equipment, ancient harbors, and ship or plane wrecks that are associated with important historical or war events (e.g., WW I and II) [3,4], although encompassing remarkable social, cultural, environmental, and economic values, remain in many cases largely unknown, unexplored, and unprotected as well as unexploited, in a sustainable way, for fulfilling purposes of historical remembrance and local development. This is due, among others, to a variety of difficulties that UCH identification, exploration, and protection implies; and results in a certain knowledge deficit as to their location, current condition, potential risks these are exposed to, or opportunities that can emerge from them for the society as a whole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%