2013
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-13-2695-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definition and impact of a quality index for radar-based reference measurements in the H-SAF precipitation product validation

Abstract: Abstract. The EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility on Support to Operational Hydrology and Water Management (H-SAF) provides rainfall estimations based on infrared and microwave satellite sensors on board polar and geostationary satellites. The validation of these satellite estimations is performed by the H-SAF Precipitation Product Validation Group (PPVG). A common validation methodology has been defined inside the PPVG in order to make validation results from several institutes comparable and understandab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes it difficult to set up a reliable, spatially and temporally continuous reference field, suitable to be matched to the satellite estimates: ground weather radar (Chandrasekar et al, 2008;Capacci and Porcù, 2009;Lábó, 2012;Rinollo et al, 2013) and rain gauge networks (Dinku et al, 2007;Sohn et al, 2010) are mainly used to provide rainfall reference fields for validation studies. A number of studies, however, point out that care should be taken in comparing satellite and ground-based precipitation estimates for validation purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This makes it difficult to set up a reliable, spatially and temporally continuous reference field, suitable to be matched to the satellite estimates: ground weather radar (Chandrasekar et al, 2008;Capacci and Porcù, 2009;Lábó, 2012;Rinollo et al, 2013) and rain gauge networks (Dinku et al, 2007;Sohn et al, 2010) are mainly used to provide rainfall reference fields for validation studies. A number of studies, however, point out that care should be taken in comparing satellite and ground-based precipitation estimates for validation purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A representativeness error is introduced when comparing areal instantaneous data (from satellites) with punctual cumulated values (from rain gauges) (Zawadzki, 1975;Kitchen and Blackall, 1992;Habib et al, 2009), pointing out that this error is not negligible (Porcù et al, 2014). Intrinsic discrepancies between satellite and ground radar estimates are also to be expected due to the different points of view of the two sensors (Habib and Krajeski, 2002;Chandrasekar et al, 2008;Rinollo at al., 2013). To cope with these difficulties, satellite missions devoted to precipitation studies have developed their own validation structures, such as the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) (Wolff et al, 2005) and the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Mission (Schwaller et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SRI product used here represents the best estimate from the radar network available for the period under analysis, and it has already been used to validate satellite rainfall estimates (Cimini et al, 2013), including EUMETSAT H-SAF products (Puca et al, 2014). Procedures to improve the quality of the SRI product, including attenuation compensation, polarimetric rainfall inversion techniques, and adaptive algorithms to retrieve the mean vertical profiles of reflectivity have recently been developed at DPC (Vulpiani et al, 2012;Rinollo et al, 2013). All the products are available on a grid of 1400 × 1400 km 2 , with a spatial resolution of circa 1 km and a temporal resolution of 15 min.…”
Section: E Ricciardelli Et Al: a Statistical Approach For Rain Intementioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is the reason why the training database for the PNPR algorithm is based on the same physical foundation used for the CDRD algorithm. Moreover, the two algorithms use the same procedures to determine the phase of the retrieved precipitation (following the studies of Grody et al, 2000;Rosenkranz, 2003;and Surussavadee and Staelin, 2009), as well as the same precipitation screening methodology following an algorithm developed by Chen and Staelin (2003), and finally the same specially tailored surface identification procedures (see Mugnai et al, 2013).…”
Section: Pr-obs-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, quality index maps are produced and associated to all ground data. The quality index, which is a function of position and time, is subsumed into a single number ranging between 0 and 1, and uses all essential information available to quantify the reliability of the ground data to which the index must be associated (see Vulpiani et al, 2008, andRinollo et al, 2013).…”
Section: A Mugnai Et Al: Precipitation Products From the Hydrology mentioning
confidence: 99%