2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.12.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definition of nominal stress-based FAT classes of complex welded steel structures using the Peak Stress Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculation steps were complicated, and the resulting data could not be directly mapped to each node in the weld model. The nominal stress method has been broadly used in fatigue assessment [13][14][15][16]. This method references a defined component cross-section and neglects the local peak stresses resulting from geometrical notches or load applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation steps were complicated, and the resulting data could not be directly mapped to each node in the weld model. The nominal stress method has been broadly used in fatigue assessment [13][14][15][16]. This method references a defined component cross-section and neglects the local peak stresses resulting from geometrical notches or load applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nominal stress method [4,5], the critical distance method [6][7][8][9], and the effective stress volume method [10,11] are most commonly used to estimate the high-cycle fatigue life of notched components. The accuracy of NSM mainly depends on the correction factor (stress concentration factor loading, stress size coefficient, roughness coefficient) and S-N curves of materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%