2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40261-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformable Shape Reconstruction from Monocular Video with Manifold Forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that work, the structure of data is estimated using Euclidean distances between pairs of data items, whereas the method proposed in this paper learns the structure from the data, based on random forests techniques. This paper updates and extends the work in [33] with the following four main differences: (a) The method presented in this paper has an additional step in the algorithm, solving the problem when some elements of the measurement matrix are missing; (b) Considering the majority of algorithms are based on minimising squared residual of an error function which makes them sensitive to outliers, another improvement is to reduce the effect of outliers by replacing the L 2 estimator by robust M-estimator [26]; (c) A modification of the method is described when only a relatively small number of training shapes is available. This was firstly introduced by the authors in [32] but without random forests manifold learning technique; (d) More comprehensive set of experiments is presented in the experimental section.…”
Section: Noveltysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In that work, the structure of data is estimated using Euclidean distances between pairs of data items, whereas the method proposed in this paper learns the structure from the data, based on random forests techniques. This paper updates and extends the work in [33] with the following four main differences: (a) The method presented in this paper has an additional step in the algorithm, solving the problem when some elements of the measurement matrix are missing; (b) Considering the majority of algorithms are based on minimising squared residual of an error function which makes them sensitive to outliers, another improvement is to reduce the effect of outliers by replacing the L 2 estimator by robust M-estimator [26]; (c) A modification of the method is described when only a relatively small number of training shapes is available. This was firstly introduced by the authors in [32] but without random forests manifold learning technique; (d) More comprehensive set of experiments is presented in the experimental section.…”
Section: Noveltysupporting
confidence: 72%