2002
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-221x2002000200002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformaciones Diferidas en Probetas Pequeñas Y Libres De Defectos De Eucalyptus Grandis De Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1, where it is possible to appreciate separately the mean values of u/u inst for i) the whole sample, ii) the beams free of pith and iii) the pieces with pith. In relation to the whole sample, and in line with other reports (Andriamitantsoa 1995, Calvo et al 2002, a relatively rapid increase of u/u inst at the beginning of the test can be found. The creep rate goes on with a significant slope up to 2 months, although its slope is smaller than the one registered during the first week.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1, where it is possible to appreciate separately the mean values of u/u inst for i) the whole sample, ii) the beams free of pith and iii) the pieces with pith. In relation to the whole sample, and in line with other reports (Andriamitantsoa 1995, Calvo et al 2002, a relatively rapid increase of u/u inst at the beginning of the test can be found. The creep rate goes on with a significant slope up to 2 months, although its slope is smaller than the one registered during the first week.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Results of a research carried out with small clear specimens of Argentinean Eucalyptus grandis (Calvo et al 2002) Table 3 Summary of results for relative deflections (u/u inst ) corresponding to different periods of time after loading Tabelle 3 Ergebnisse der relativen Durchbiegungen (u/u inst ) für verschiedene Zeiträume nach der Belastung similar conditions to the present structural beams, show mean values of 1.48, 2.25 and 2.25, for the same relation and the same periods of time after loading. The great difference found between these results may be explained by the influence of variation in moisture content, which is greater and faster in small-scale specimens than in structural timber.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ésta exhibe una mayor inclinación de las micro-fibrillas de la pared celular que la madera madura, lo cual disminuye su resistencia y rigidez (Chan-Martín et al 2002, Donaldson 2008, Yin et al 2011) e influye sobre el desarrollo de las deformaciones diferidas (Roszyk et al 2010, Roszyk et al 2012. En Argentina se han publicado estudios de las deformaciones diferidas en el Eucalyptus grandis de rápido crecimiento, llevados a cabo tanto sobre pequeñas probetas (Calvo et al 2002) como sobre piezas de tamaño estructural en estado inicial seco (Piter et al 2006, Piter et al 2007) y en estado inicial verde (Torrán et al 2008). Respecto de las especies que son objeto de este proyecto, se han reportado resultados preliminares que proveen valores medios de las deformaciones diferidas en forma discriminada para cada especie y para piezas con y sin médula (Fank et al 2017, Fank 2018.…”
unclassified