1984
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(84)90491-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation and stability of drops and bubbles in an electric field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Grigor'ev et al (1999) concluded that as the gas permittivity is normally much smaller than that of the liquid, only the second mechanism identified by Sherwood (1988) could possibly be applicable to bubbles, with the conditions being met by assuming a good conductivity inside the bubble (and hence a constant interior potential) as the result of a large mobility of charge being present on the interface between the two phases. (An earlier study by Cheng & Chaddock (1984) using a free energy argument was unable to find critical conditions beyond which bubbles would become unstable. They attributed this result to the fact that the prolate spheroid shape they assumed for the bubble was too approximate, but still expected the bubble to disintegrate if sufficient elongation was incurred due to the application of the electric field.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Grigor'ev et al (1999) concluded that as the gas permittivity is normally much smaller than that of the liquid, only the second mechanism identified by Sherwood (1988) could possibly be applicable to bubbles, with the conditions being met by assuming a good conductivity inside the bubble (and hence a constant interior potential) as the result of a large mobility of charge being present on the interface between the two phases. (An earlier study by Cheng & Chaddock (1984) using a free energy argument was unable to find critical conditions beyond which bubbles would become unstable. They attributed this result to the fact that the prolate spheroid shape they assumed for the bubble was too approximate, but still expected the bubble to disintegrate if sufficient elongation was incurred due to the application of the electric field.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A number of researchers have explored the case of a suspended drop in a uniform electric field, including Taylor [10], Landau and Lifshitz [46], Cheng and Chaddock [47], Sozou [48], Baygents and Rivette [17,49], and Tomar et al [18]. For this case, the geometry and electric field alignment are identical to that for the dielectric drop in the preceding section, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Deforming Spheroidal Dropmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the absence of electric field and neglecting the line tension, the solutions to (2.1), (2.2) and (2.6) can be obtained by solving an ordinary differential equation, see [30,39]. In the presence of electric field, the non-local Maxwell stress (2.5) makes the analytical and numerical solutions to (2.1), (2.2) and (2.6) or (2.7) challenging problems.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy-based approach in EHD has been employed by Cheng & Chaddock [39] to analyse the deformation and stability of spheroidal homogeneous bubbles in an electric field where the effect of the solid substrate is neglected. In the subsequent work [30], the authors obtained the shape profile of a bubble elongating in the electric field and determined the departure size at different electric field strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation