1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00608148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation structure of the crazing type in a dispersion-filled polyethylene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior could be explained as follows: the impact strength was higher for the heterophasic copolymer because, besides the EVA content, it has higher elastomeric regions from the EP phase distributed into the PP matrix. This heterophasic copolymer characteristic would enhance the impact strength by transmitting and dissipating this stress into the elastomeric phases of the PP‐EP system 37, 38. On the other hand, elongation at break was higher for the PP‐ r ‐EP blend over the entire composition range which could be attributed to physical entanglements between the copolymer phases (mostly amorphous) or debonding mechanism between phases that allows a higher molecular sliding and deformation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior could be explained as follows: the impact strength was higher for the heterophasic copolymer because, besides the EVA content, it has higher elastomeric regions from the EP phase distributed into the PP matrix. This heterophasic copolymer characteristic would enhance the impact strength by transmitting and dissipating this stress into the elastomeric phases of the PP‐EP system 37, 38. On the other hand, elongation at break was higher for the PP‐ r ‐EP blend over the entire composition range which could be attributed to physical entanglements between the copolymer phases (mostly amorphous) or debonding mechanism between phases that allows a higher molecular sliding and deformation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition to uniform yielding was explained by weak adhesion between the filler and the polymer leading to debonding of the particles from the polymer (8). On the micro-scopic scale, yield was not uniform and consisted in growth of craze-like structures (8, 14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%