2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10208-008-9024-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation Techniques for Sparse Systems

Abstract: Abstract. We exhibit a probabilistic symbolic algorithm for solving zerodimensional sparse systems. Our algorithm combines a symbolic homotopy procedure, based on a flat deformation of a certain morphism of affine varieties, with the polyhedral deformation of Huber and Sturmfels. The complexity of our algorithm is quadratic in the size of the combinatorial structure of the input system. This size is mainly represented by the mixed volume of Newton polytopes of the input polynomials and an arithmetic analogue o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already said, the techniques used in the algorithm are not new: we first solve the system modulo a prime, using a symbolic homotopy algorithm that adapts to the multi-homogeneous case an algorithm given by Jeronimo et al [26] for the sparse case; then, we use lifting techniques from [21,44], as well as techniques coming from [41,Section 4], to recover the output over Z. Taking into account our upper bound on the height of the output, this results in the first bound (that we are aware of) on the boolean cost of solving polynomial systems that involves their multi-homogeneous structure in such a manner.…”
Section: Multi-homogeneous Polynomial Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As already said, the techniques used in the algorithm are not new: we first solve the system modulo a prime, using a symbolic homotopy algorithm that adapts to the multi-homogeneous case an algorithm given by Jeronimo et al [26] for the sparse case; then, we use lifting techniques from [21,44], as well as techniques coming from [41,Section 4], to recover the output over Z. Taking into account our upper bound on the height of the output, this results in the first bound (that we are aware of) on the boolean cost of solving polynomial systems that involves their multi-homogeneous structure in such a manner.…”
Section: Multi-homogeneous Polynomial Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, d i,m ). Closer to us are two algorithms from [21] and [26]. The geometric resolution algorithm of [21] solves our questions in time quadratic in a particular geometric degree associated to the input system; however, in general, this degree cannot be controlled in terms of the quantities C n (d) and C n (d ) used in our analysis (see for example those systems appearing in [25]); in addition, we are not aware of a probability analysis for it.…”
Section: Multi-homogeneous Polynomial Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So, we first compute a geometric resolution associated with α (x) for each S B,e : after solving a linear system, the x-coordinates of points in S B,e turn to be defined by a square polynomial system in separated variables; then, the required computation can be achieved as in [27,Sect. 5 The whole complexity of this step is O(nD 2 log 2 (D) log log(D)).…”
Section: Proposition 24 There Is a Probabilistic Algorithm That Takimentioning
confidence: 99%