2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.93.052320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degeneracy, degree, and heavy tails in quantum annealing

Abstract: Both simulated quantum annealing and physical quantum annealing have shown the emergence of "heavy tails" in their performance as optimizers: The total time needed to solve a set of random input instances is dominated by a small number of very hard instances. Classical simulated annealing, in contrast, does not show such heavy tails. Here we explore the origin of these heavy tails, which appear for inputs with high local degeneracy-large isoenergetic clusters of states in Hamming space. This category includes … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, which generalises equation (9) to spins. We restate that this choice of local Lindblad operators does not lead to thermalisation in the steady state, as for this purpose nonlocal terms would be required.…”
Section: ( )mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, which generalises equation (9) to spins. We restate that this choice of local Lindblad operators does not lead to thermalisation in the steady state, as for this purpose nonlocal terms would be required.…”
Section: ( )mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Together with the progress in implementing quantum gates and concatenating them, i.e. by realising standard circuit computation [4], recently, adiabatic quantum computation (AQC) [5] and quantum annealing [6] have received a tremendous boost thanks to the experiments performed with D-wave machines [7][8][9][10]. The strategy underlying adiabatic quantum computation [5,6] is based on the fact that any quantum algorithm can be formulated in terms of identifying the global minimum (ground state) of a given function (Hamiltonian) over a set of many local minima.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T is called the annealing time and the functions A and B determine the annealing schedule (for details on D-Wave's schedule, see Refs. [3] and [28]).…”
Section: 1 Quantum Annealingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A spin in a classical state is said to be free or floppy if flipping the spin results in another classical state that is degenerate. Floppy qubits, and associated degeneracies, have been implicated in perturbative anticrossings 4,6,8 .…”
Section: B Connecting Perturbative Anticrossings and Degeneracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously available quantum annealing systems have allowed only uniform QA, in which each qubit is initialized with the same transverse-field driver Hamiltonian and all qubits are annealed in unison. In this case smallgap perturbative anticrossings can arise in unfavorably structured inputs, even those that are not particularly hard for classical solvers [4][5][6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%