2019
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2019.2893803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degenerate Motion Analysis for Aided INS With Online Spatial and Temporal Sensor Calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With IN2LAAMA's front-end being built upon planar and edge features, the trajectory needs to allow for the frame-to-frame registration of at least three non-coplanar planes or non-collinear edges to constrain the lidar pose estimation properly. As demonstrated in [32], the calibration parameters are not observable for every trajectory. The ideal ones are random paths that stimulate the IMU's six DoFs.…”
Section: F Real-data -Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With IN2LAAMA's front-end being built upon planar and edge features, the trajectory needs to allow for the frame-to-frame registration of at least three non-coplanar planes or non-collinear edges to constrain the lidar pose estimation properly. As demonstrated in [32], the calibration parameters are not observable for every trajectory. The ideal ones are random paths that stimulate the IMU's six DoFs.…”
Section: F Real-data -Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zuo et al [31] developed a Lidar-inertial-camera odometry that could refine the spatial-temporal parameters online along with sensor pose estimation. Yang et al [32] analyzed the observability of spatial-temporal parameters and showed that they were both observable if the sensor platform underwent fully random motion. The authors also identified four degenerate motions that were harmful to the calibration accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The online methods assumed that the measurements from a camera and an IMU were well synchronized (e.g., [14][15][16][17][18][19]), or the extrinsic spatial parameter was known in advance (e.g., [20][21][22]), or both conditions were satisfied (e.g., [23][24][25][26][27][28]). In the case where both the measurements from different sensors are asynchronous and the extrinsic spatial parameter between different sensors is unknown, most of the existing methods [29][30][31][32][33][34] are designed for filter-based VIOs since they are usually built on the Multi-State Constraint Kalman Filter (MSCKF [35]) framework. They perform the state propagation/prediction by integrating IMU measurements and perform the state update/correction by using visual measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With IN2LAAMA's front-end being built upon planar features the trajectory of the lidar need to allow the frame-to-frame registration of minimum 3 non-coplanar planes to properly constrain the lidar pose estimation. As demonstrated in [33], some trajectory types do not lead to observable calibration parameters. The ideal trajectories are random paths that stimulate the 6-DoF of the IMU.…”
Section: E Real-data -Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%