2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2018.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degenerating Hermitian metrics and spectral geometry of the canonical bundle

Abstract: Let (X, h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complex space of complex dimension m. In this paper we are interested in the Dolbeault operator acting on the space of L 2 sections of the canonical bundle of reg(X), the regular part of X. More precisely let dm,0 : L 2 Ω m,0 (reg(X), h) → L 2 Ω m,1 (reg(X), h) be an arbitrarily fixed closed extension of ∂m,0 : L 2 Ω m,0 (reg(X), h) → L 2 Ω m,1 (reg(X), h) where the domain of the latter operator is Ω m,0 c (reg(X)). We establish various properties such as close… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…0.2 had been already proved in [20] and [28] in the setting of projective varieties with isolated singularities and complex dimension 2 and 3 respectively. Concerning (2) we prove similar results that we can summarize in the next two theorems: Theorem 0.3. Let (X, h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complex space of complex dimension v. There exist positive constants a and b such that for each f ∈ C ∞ c (reg(X)) we have df 2 L 2 Ω 1 (reg(X),h) ≤ a f 2 L 2 (reg(X),h) + b ∂f 2 L 2 Ω 0,1 (reg(X),h) .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…0.2 had been already proved in [20] and [28] in the setting of projective varieties with isolated singularities and complex dimension 2 and 3 respectively. Concerning (2) we prove similar results that we can summarize in the next two theorems: Theorem 0.3. Let (X, h) be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complex space of complex dimension v. There exist positive constants a and b such that for each f ∈ C ∞ c (reg(X)) we have df 2 L 2 Ω 1 (reg(X),h) ≤ a f 2 L 2 (reg(X),h) + b ∂f 2 L 2 Ω 0,1 (reg(X),h) .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…where both the operators above are viewed as unbounded, densely defined and closable operators acting on L 2 (reg(X), h). Our main results show the existence of a self-adjoint extension with discrete spectrum for both (1) and (2) with an estimate for the growth of the corresponding eigenvalues. Let us go into some more details by describing how the paper is sort out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…M ). As b(2) 2 (M ) = 2h 2,0(2) (M ) + h 1,1 (2) (M ) and 2h 2,0 (2) (M ) − h 1,1 (2) (M ) = 0 we can conclude that b(2) 2 (M ) > 0 and therefore χ(M ) > 0 as desired. Finally, according to Th.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The first aim of this note is to reformulate the above two theorems by replacing the terms on the right hand sides of (1) and (2) with the corresponding L 2 -versions. More precisely one of the main result of this paper can be summarized in this way:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%