2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(99)00556-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation of ethinyl estradiol by nitrifying activated sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
134
3
10

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
13
134
3
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Better removal was obtained for all the EDCs with increasing rate of nitrification for each of the WWTP. This agrees with the findings of Vader et al (2000) where they found that no degradation of EE2 was observed when there was insignificant nitrifying capacity. Biofilters and RBC have low nitrification rates relative to ASPs and oxidation ditches.…”
Section: Biological Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Better removal was obtained for all the EDCs with increasing rate of nitrification for each of the WWTP. This agrees with the findings of Vader et al (2000) where they found that no degradation of EE2 was observed when there was insignificant nitrifying capacity. Biofilters and RBC have low nitrification rates relative to ASPs and oxidation ditches.…”
Section: Biological Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Körner et al [129] reported a marginal estrogenic response, with a Relative Proliferative Effect (RPE) of 10% (in the study of Körner et al [129], RPE indicated the proliferative effect of effluent wastewater on the MCF-7 breast cancer cells relative to the positive control 17β-estradiol (E2)) of the effluent from a textile WWTP adopting an ASP with nitrification-denitrification. In a strong agreement, Vader et al [130] suggested that high removal of estrogens (in the range of 79-95%) was mainly attributed to the nitrifying stage. Findings of McAdam et al [131] also showed the same patterns where nitrifying appeared in higher de-ethoxylation of long-chain nonylphenolic compounds (NP [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] EO), at approximately 92%, and partial removal of NP, whereas non-nitrifying process yielded poorer de-ethoxylation and an accumulation of NP.…”
Section: The Role Of the Secondary Activated Sludge Processmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Free ammonia mono-oxygenase enzymes released by lysis extracellularly are not likely to be involved in biodegradation [52,87]. Gaulke et al [88] observed that EE2 removal in nitrifying batch studies was not by nitrifying bacteria activity, dismissing the hypothesis that nitrification augments EE2 removals [89]. The synthesis of nitro-EE2 confirmed that EE2 is nitrated at high ammonia feed concentrations caused by the high production of nitrates; EE2 removal here is an artefact of laboratory scale investigation.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 81%