2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation of polycrystalline rhodium and rhodium nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current density for surface oxide formation between 0.8 and 1.2 V SHE ranges between 80 and 110 lA cm À2 , which is in good agreement with values obtained with the RDE at identical scan rates [23] and by other authors [12,16], assuming a proportional relation between oxide formation current density and scan rate in the latter cases. The shift of the reduction peak towards more negative potentials at higher potential limits due to irreversible oxide formation is nicely represented by the dataset.…”
Section: Measurements Under Argonsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The current density for surface oxide formation between 0.8 and 1.2 V SHE ranges between 80 and 110 lA cm À2 , which is in good agreement with values obtained with the RDE at identical scan rates [23] and by other authors [12,16], assuming a proportional relation between oxide formation current density and scan rate in the latter cases. The shift of the reduction peak towards more negative potentials at higher potential limits due to irreversible oxide formation is nicely represented by the dataset.…”
Section: Measurements Under Argonsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…4 approximately 1.7% of a monolayer of Rh is lost. Considering a recent study using an RDE setup using an identical electrode material [23], where the conditions of one experimental series (potential cycling at 100 mV s À1 between 0.7 and 1.07 V RHE in 0.1 M sulfuric acid) nearly match the ones applied here, a mass loss of 4.9 ng cm À2 cycle À1 (2.2% of a ML) was found. This value compares fairly well with the data presented in this work; the slight variations between the RDE and the SFC can most likely be attributed to the different electrolyte flow rate and velocity profile, both affecting possible re-deposition processes during the negative cycle, besides the slight difference in the potential window.…”
Section: Online Dissolution Analysis -The Effect Of the Scan Ratementioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In earlier reports, the stability of surface atoms has been examined by monitoring the potential-dependent change in surface morphology, either by utilizing cycling voltammetry (CV) alone or by a combination of CVs and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) or surface X-ray scattering (SXS). Although these approaches were successful in measuring oxide-induced changes in both the local structure of surface atoms (STM) and long-range roughening of well-defined single crystals (SXS), these methods were unable to provide any information about the corrosion of metal surface atomsa subject that is of great fundamental and technological importance. Very recently, however, the development of a scanning flow cell (SFC) coupled to an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) has enabled in situ measurements of the dissolution of polycrystalline metal electrodes. By utilizing this method, it was possible to establish relationships between potential-dependent oxide formation in various environments ,,, (pH 1–13, presence of Cl – anions, and reactive atmospheres such as H 2 , O 2 , and CO) and the dissolution of the corresponding cations with high sensitivity (ca. 3 pg cm –2 s –1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the EOR activity of PtRh alloy catalysts has been evaluated at potentials over 1.0 V vs. RHE [1,[20][21][22][23][24][25] that was higher than the potential of oxidative Rh dissolution (0.8 V vs. RHE) [28,29]. So, the surface composition of PtRh alloys must be changed during the EOR activity evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%