Degré d'innovation et performances des entreprises: limites des recherches actuelles et nouvelles perspectives pour le management de l'innovation

Local public innovation: an analysis of its perceived impacts on public performance

“…Moreover, this study, which points out the multiple and specific impacts of public innovations, is in line with the conclusions of Liouville (2006) on the need for an organisation to have a ‘portfolio of innovations’, enabling it to optimise its innovation management. Indeed, several works have focused on this notion and its interests.…”

“…Indeed, they encounter difficulties in capitalising on and learning from past changes. This is why our approach could enable local authorities to benefit from a framework for analysing the impacts of innovations, and thus change the structuring of their ‘innovation portfolio’ (Liouville, 2006).…”

“…However, it would also be interesting to include certain moderating variables in this analysis, such as contextual variables or the process of adoption and implementation of these innovations. This is why, going forward, this research will focus on the results of the innovations, analysed in relation to the terms and conditions of their implementation process, as recommended by Liouville (2006). This would make it possible to grasp and explore the interactions and complementarities likely to exist between the types of innovations (Favoreu et al., 2018), and thus to better understand the sequential results of public innovations.…”

L’innovation publique locale : une analyse de ses impacts perçus en matière de performance publique

“…However, it would also be interesting to include in this analysis certain moderating variables, such as contextual variables or the process of adoption and implementation of these innovations. This is why, going forward, this research will focus on the results of the innovations, analysed in relation to the terms and conditions of its implementation process, as recommended by Liouville (2006). This would make it possible to grasp and explore the interactions and complementarities likely to exist between the types of innovations (Favoreu et al, 2018), and thus to better understand the sequential results of public innovations.…”

Inter-organisation et brevet : une proposition de classification

“…Il convient d'admettre que l'innovation radicale, si elle ne saurait être négligée, est moins fréquente. Toutefois, il semble préférable et pertinent de raisonner en termes de continuité et de positionnement à un moment donné (Kline, Rosenberg, 1986 ;Liouville, 2006) Le spectre de coordination nécessaire va de la simple collaboration entre deux acteurs industriels ayant intérêt à réaliser une transaction mutuellement avantageuse à une démarche coopérative. La dimension collaborative et, a fortiori coopérative, s'impose en matière de R&D (Harigan, 1985 ;Contractor, Lorange, 1988 ;Jacquemin, 1988 ;Kogut, 1989 ;Stuart, Podolny, 1996 ;Powell et al, 1996 ;Mowery et al, 1996 ;Mothe, 1997 ;Brouwer, Kleinknecht, 1999 ;Arundel, 2001 ;Hall, Ziedonis, 2001 ;Hagedoorn, 2002) pour diminuer les coûts, augmenter la productivité mais aussi l'efficacité des dépenses en recherche.…”