2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(03)00042-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delamination properties of translaminar-reinforced composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, modified beam theory (MBT) assumes that C 1/3 is a linear function of crack length, but this is only true in the case when fracture toughness has a constant value during crack propagation. In the case of large scale bridging, the experimental points form a curved line, and therefore linear fitting procedures cannot be used to find the correction [6,18]. Nonlinear fracture mechanics would be a better approach to evaluate fracture parameters in DCB [44].…”
Section: Finite Element Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, modified beam theory (MBT) assumes that C 1/3 is a linear function of crack length, but this is only true in the case when fracture toughness has a constant value during crack propagation. In the case of large scale bridging, the experimental points form a curved line, and therefore linear fitting procedures cannot be used to find the correction [6,18]. Nonlinear fracture mechanics would be a better approach to evaluate fracture parameters in DCB [44].…”
Section: Finite Element Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the FE model provides insight to explain the observed effect of MWCNTs on interlaminar fracture of CFRP. LEFM is utilized to calculate fracture toughness in this investigation following ASTM D5528 standards and others [3,6,13,14,34] to compare between different specimens and study the effect of COOH-MWCNTs on the delamination growth. Comparisons between the experimental and numerical results for the delamination growth vs. load (Figure 19a,b) and delamination growth vs. displacement (Figure 19c,d) for the neat and 0.5 wt% MWCNTs specimens have been made.…”
Section: Finite Element Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reported values for mode I delamination toughness vary widely depending on the stitch density and architecture. A typical 2D-woven carbon-fibre epoxy composite would be expected to have a propagation G IC of approximately 600-800 J/m 2 [16,17] whilst 3D woven composites have reported to have propagation G IC from approximately 1400-6400 J/m 2 [16,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%