“…These claims come across in spite of the long-held recognition that, with regard to sexual traits, intrasexual variability is as large as intersexual variability ( Whalen, 1991 ), that the origin of brain sexual differences within and across sexual populations is multifaceted ( McCarthy et al, 2018 ) and that there might be a continuum of sexual traits ( Epstein et al, 2012 ; Walton et al, 2016 ) that could explain sexual fluidity ( Diamond, 2016 ; Diamond et al, 2017 ; Luoto et al, 2019 ) within and across the sexes. In addition, ejaculatory endophenotypes, as it is the case for other endophenotypes (e.g., Gottesman and Gould, 2003 ; Burmeister et al, 2008 ; Iacono et al, 2014 ; Jonas and Markon, 2014 ; for critical reviews see Flint and Munafò, 2007 ; Walters and Owen, 2007 ), are even alleged to be genetically determined ( Pattij et al, 2005 ; Waldinger and Olivier, 2005 ; Olivier et al, 2006 ; Santtila et al, 2010 ; Abdel-Hamid and Ali, 2018 ; Olivier and Olivier, 2019 ), and therefore they must be the heritable, state-independent, and largely immune to social context and sexual experience once the ejaculatory pattern has been established. In addition, ejaculatory endophenotypes might also be associated to characteristic brains ( Ozcan et al, 2001 ; Waldinger and Schweitzer, 2005 ; Hyun et al, 2008 ; Chen, 2016 ; Zhang et al, 2017 ; Yang et al, 2018 ).…”