1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01291603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed muon induced fission of209Bi and the role of meson-exchange currents

Abstract: The probability for delayed muon induced fission of 2~ has been determined from a ~ -,flf2) measurement. The measured fission probability Pr = (4.2 _+0.7)x 10 -5 is compared with theoretical predictions. The high fission threshold reaction seems well suited for studying the influence of two-body meson-exchange currents in nuclear muon capture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been stressed that the muon absorption process on nucleons correlated by meson-exchange currents (MEC) has also to be taken into account [33]. This calculation has recently been experimentally verified in studying the delayed fission probability of the high fission threshold nucleus 2~ [10]. This calculation has recently been experimentally verified in studying the delayed fission probability of the high fission threshold nucleus 2~ [10].…”
Section: Pfc = ~ I(e) Pf(e) Dementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been stressed that the muon absorption process on nucleons correlated by meson-exchange currents (MEC) has also to be taken into account [33]. This calculation has recently been experimentally verified in studying the delayed fission probability of the high fission threshold nucleus 2~ [10]. This calculation has recently been experimentally verified in studying the delayed fission probability of the high fission threshold nucleus 2~ [10].…”
Section: Pfc = ~ I(e) Pf(e) Dementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, the fission probability Pfc has been evaluated again using (2) by simply shifting the nuclear response function distributions according to the mass differences M(A,Z) -M(A, Z-1) taken from [45,46]. This is in accordance with the result of [10]. Aside model [31 ], which is definitively worse, no preference to the specific models [30,32,36] can be given.…”
Section: Pfc = ~ I(e) Pf(e) Dementioning
confidence: 96%