2010
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2010.218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed platelet recovery after allogeneic transplantation: a predictor of increased treatment-related mortality and poorer survival

Abstract: Delayed platelet recovery (DPR) is common after allo-SCT. Insufficient data on risk factors and association with OS and TRM are available. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all allografts at the University of Minnesota between 2000 and 2005 to characterize the frequency of DPR (platelets o50 000/lL by day 60), risk factors and related complications. A total of 850 patients with hematological malignancies and benign disorders were included. Myeloablative (MA) conditioning was used in 65% of the patients … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
57
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Delayed engraftment and slow immune reconstitution predispose to lethal infections and hemorrhages, as well as increased transfusion requirements, prolonged length of hospital stay, and high early mortality. [12][13][14][15] Although considerable effort has been devoted to address the problem, such as using double units of cord blood, intrabone infusion or co-infusion of expanded cord blood progenitors, [15][16][17][18][19] none has been shown to clearly overcome the obstacles so far. [20][21][22][23] In order to speed up hematopoietic recovery, the team from Universidad Autonoma de Madrid has pioneered a transplantation strategy of myeloablative cord SCT combined with related haploidentical stem cells as a third-party donor support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Delayed engraftment and slow immune reconstitution predispose to lethal infections and hemorrhages, as well as increased transfusion requirements, prolonged length of hospital stay, and high early mortality. [12][13][14][15] Although considerable effort has been devoted to address the problem, such as using double units of cord blood, intrabone infusion or co-infusion of expanded cord blood progenitors, [15][16][17][18][19] none has been shown to clearly overcome the obstacles so far. [20][21][22][23] In order to speed up hematopoietic recovery, the team from Universidad Autonoma de Madrid has pioneered a transplantation strategy of myeloablative cord SCT combined with related haploidentical stem cells as a third-party donor support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, post transplant monocyte levels have not previously been associated with acute GVHD, although pretransplant recipient monocyte counts have previously been reported to increase this risk. 24 Poor platelet recovery is similarly associated with increased nonrelapse mortality due to acute GVHD, 25 and whether any impact of ALC and AMC recovery on acute GVHD is also associated with or independent of platelet recovery will be determined in a future study. Allograft monocytes can suppress T-cell proliferation in a dose-dependent fashion, potentially protecting from GVHD effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That time to platelet engraftment was influenced by graft type and donor type has been previously reported, with PBSC grafts associated with faster platelet engraftment. 8 Prolonged platelet nadirs can increase morbidity and mortality during transplantation because of increased bleeding risk, and platelet transfusions themselves can be associated with allergic and immunologic reactions that can contribute to transplant-related morbidity and mortality. 12 It is now generally accepted that a safe transfusion threshold for platelets is 10 Â 10 9 /L.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of advantages of umbilical cord blood in shortened stem cell procurement times and decreased GVHD incidence and severity, 6 most evidence indicates delayed platelet engraftment times and, in some cases, delayed time to neutrophil engraftment. 7 The significance of delayed neutrophil and platelet engraftment times on overall survival has been reported, 8 but the extent to which engraftment times are affected by demographic, therapeutic and other clinical factors is poorly understood. In this retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing SCT at the University of Rochester, we assessed the relationship between platelet and neutrophil engraftment times and patient age, gender, donor source of stem cells, type of graft and the effect of conditioning regimen intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%