1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(99)00010-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delays in the detection of hypoxemia due to site of pulse oximetry probe placement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation of this study is due to the use of finger pulse oximetry rather than the direct assessment of SaO 2 , which is less accurate at SaO 2 below 75–85% (Trivedi et al, 1997 ; Kolb et al, 2004 ). Another drawback of finger pulse oximetry is related to the slow response time of all pulse oximeters (Trivedi et al, 1997 ), with the delay being higher for finger than earlobe placements (Trivedi et al, 1997 ; Hamber et al, 1999 ). Consequently, the SpO 2 values recorded during the first 10 s of the transitions from hypoxia to higher P I O 2 underestimated the actual SaO 2 values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of this study is due to the use of finger pulse oximetry rather than the direct assessment of SaO 2 , which is less accurate at SaO 2 below 75–85% (Trivedi et al, 1997 ; Kolb et al, 2004 ). Another drawback of finger pulse oximetry is related to the slow response time of all pulse oximeters (Trivedi et al, 1997 ), with the delay being higher for finger than earlobe placements (Trivedi et al, 1997 ; Hamber et al, 1999 ). Consequently, the SpO 2 values recorded during the first 10 s of the transitions from hypoxia to higher P I O 2 underestimated the actual SaO 2 values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adults, ear probes have been shown to respond more rapidly to transient changes in SpO 2 than peripheral (finger/toe) sensors . It is recommended that consideration and documentation of sensor site should be made in settings where transient changes in saturation may be expected (such as in sleep and exercise laboratories or in hyperbaric/hypobaric settings).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Pulse Oximetry Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PPG from the ear canal has also been shown to be far more sensitive than earlobe and finger PPG to amplitude variations that arise from respiration, thus allowing for a better measurement of respiration rate [ 18 ]. Furthermore, a significant delay has been observed between earlobe/behind-the-ear pulse oximetry, and pulse oximetry on the hand or the foot for detection of hypoxemia (low levels of blood oxygen) [ 12 , 19 ], which is primarily caused by the distance from the core blood supply. Although never previously shown, a similar fast response time was hypothesised from the ear canal given that its vasculature is supplied by the carotid artery, as is the brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%