2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deletion of adenosine A1 or A2A receptors reduces l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine-induced dyskinesia in a model of Parkinson's disease

Abstract: Adenosine A2A receptor antagonism provides a promising approach to developing nondopaminergic therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Clinical trials of A2A antagonists have targeted PD patients with L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA)-induced dyskinesia (LID) in an effort to improve parkinsonian symptoms. The role of adenosine in the development of LID is little known, especially regarding its actions via A1 receptors. We aimed to examine the effects of genetic deletion and pharmacological blockade of A1 and/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1; Federico and Spalluto, 2012; Glade, 2010; Marjo and Miia, 2010; Müller and Jacobson, 2011; Ojeda-López et al, 2012; Paul et al, 2011; Ramlackhansingh et al, 2011; Rosim et al, 2011; Schenone et al, 2010). Experimental evidence supports the use of caffeine and other adenosine receptor antagonists as well as adenosine receptor agonists in the reduction of hyperalgesia, antinociception, excitotoxicity, inflammatory response, dyskinesia, akinesia, sensory and motor deficits and neuronal cell death related to the pathophysiology of the neurodegenerative diseases discussed (Camilo and Goldstein, 2004; Ding et al, 2007; Horiuchi et al, 2010; Kowaluk, 1998; Kitta et al, 2012; Tomić et al, 2006; Xiao et al, 2011). The seemingly paradoxical use of adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists to treat similar diseases suggests that factors such as dosage, drug delivery method, state of disease progression, extracellular concentrations of potential excitotoxic transmitters and known anatomical and pharmacological relationship between adenosine and dopamine receptors as they influence glutamate release must be taken into consideration when designing treatment strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…1; Federico and Spalluto, 2012; Glade, 2010; Marjo and Miia, 2010; Müller and Jacobson, 2011; Ojeda-López et al, 2012; Paul et al, 2011; Ramlackhansingh et al, 2011; Rosim et al, 2011; Schenone et al, 2010). Experimental evidence supports the use of caffeine and other adenosine receptor antagonists as well as adenosine receptor agonists in the reduction of hyperalgesia, antinociception, excitotoxicity, inflammatory response, dyskinesia, akinesia, sensory and motor deficits and neuronal cell death related to the pathophysiology of the neurodegenerative diseases discussed (Camilo and Goldstein, 2004; Ding et al, 2007; Horiuchi et al, 2010; Kowaluk, 1998; Kitta et al, 2012; Tomić et al, 2006; Xiao et al, 2011). The seemingly paradoxical use of adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists to treat similar diseases suggests that factors such as dosage, drug delivery method, state of disease progression, extracellular concentrations of potential excitotoxic transmitters and known anatomical and pharmacological relationship between adenosine and dopamine receptors as they influence glutamate release must be taken into consideration when designing treatment strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The implications of purinergic signaling extend far beyond the present review. For example, important findings on the role of purinergic signaling in disease mechanisms of the central nervous system-such as Parkinson disease 108,109 or cancer 110 -have not been addressed here. There are many instances in which signaling events through adenosine P1 vs nucleotide P2 receptors mediate effects that go in opposing directions and are often associated with completely opposite outcomes in biological systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male R,A 1 R KO mice and their wild-type (WT) littermate controls of the inbred C57BL/6 strains from heterozygotes were generated as previously described elsewhere (Johansson et al, 2001). Polymerase chain reaction with the animal tail DNA was used to determine their genotypes (Goldman et al, 2010;Xiao et al, 2011). We also used glutamate decarboxylase 67 (GAD67)-green fluorescent protein (GFP) knock-in mice, in which GFP is expressed in GABAergic neurons under control of the endogenous GAD67 promoter (Tamamaki et al, 2003).…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%