Deleuze and Collaborative Writing

Wyatt, Jonathan; Gale, Ken; Gannon, Susanne; Davies, Bronwyn; Denzin, Norman K.; Pierre, Elizabeth Adams St.

doi:10.1177/1532708614530313

Cited by 32 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Pierre, Jackson, & Mazzei, 2016; St. Pierre & Taguchi, 2017; Wyatt et al, 2014). I’ve presented many conference papers about it, and I’m writing a book about it now for Routledge.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Post Qualitative Inquiry, the Refusal of Method, and the Risk of the New

Pierre

2019

Qualitative Inquiry

Self Cite

169

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article is a slight revision of a keynote lecture presented at the 15th International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry in Illinois in 2019. It argues that to experiment and create the “new” in post qualitative, post humanist, and other “new” forms of inquiry invented for the 21st century, social science researchers may well need to refuse conventional humanist social science research methodologies created for the problems of previous centuries.

show abstract

“…Pierre, Jackson, & Mazzei, 2016; St. Pierre & Taguchi, 2017; Wyatt et al, 2014). I’ve presented many conference papers about it, and I’m writing a book about it now for Routledge.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Post Qualitative Inquiry, the Refusal of Method, and the Risk of the New

Pierre

2019

Qualitative Inquiry

Self Cite

169

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Duoethnography possesses significant connections to other approaches to research which employ dialogical and collaborative methods, particularly those that have emerged from feminist and queer scholars 3 . These links can also be seen in collaborative autoethnography approaches (Martinez & Andreatta, 2015) and collaborative writing as a method of inquiry (Wyatt, Gale, Gannon, Davies, Denzin & St. Pierre, 2014). While duoethnography has clear connections to other approaches, it explicitly invites researchers to engage with issues of lived difference through a shared conversation.…”

Section: The Duoethnographic Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Varied starting points and pathways

Burford¹,

Mitchell²

2019

RERM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article argues that the language of ‘diversity’ does multidirectional work – highlighting issues of social justice, as well as obscuring the varied experiences of those gathered underneath its umbrella (Ahmed, 2012). It builds on existing debates about widening participation in higher education, arguing that nuanced accounts of ‘diversity’ and doctoral aspiration are required. We present a duoethnographic text about two doctoral students’ pathways to study. While both students may be positioned as ‘diverse’ within their institution’s equity policy – as a sexuality minority student, and a working-class woman of Māori and European heritage – they reveal dissimilar expectations of what university study was, or could be. These histories of imagining the university shaped their trajectories into and through doctoral study. Drawing on Appadurai’s (2004) work, we argue that aspiration can be a transformative force for ‘diverse’ doctoral students, even if the map that informs aspiration is unevenly distributed. We then investigate why the idea of the ‘academic good life’ might have such aspirational pull for politically-engaged practitioners of minority discourse (Chuh, 2013). The article makes two primary contributions. First, we call for more multifaceted understandings of doctoral ‘diversity’, and for further reflection about the ways that social difference continues to shape academic aspiration. And second, we demonstrate the potential for duothenography to provide insights into the experiences of ourselves and an-Other through a shared examination of university imaginings.

show abstract

“…As harsh as those feelings are to us, these reflections are important as we seek to achieve "clarity, connection and change" (Holman Jones, 2008, p. 207). Drawing on Denzin (in Wyatt et al, 2014), we believe that "collaborative writing is about writers being present in the moment, writing from the soul, constructing a space where selves flow together, being vulnerable, pushing always for connections between personal troubles and public issues" (p. 414).…”

Section: Last Thoughtsmentioning

confidence: 99%