Deliberating Foreign Policy: Perceptions and Effects of Citizen Participation in Germany

Abstract

Citizen participation has been a popular format in policy fields like environmental and climate policies for many years. More recently, however, it has extended to issues of foreign policy, which has long been considered as a prerogative of the executive in democratic systems. This paper analyses citizen participation in German foreign policy by comparing deliberative-participatory processes implemented by the German Federal Foreign Office (AA) and the Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety (BMU).We draw on recent scholarship in the field of deliberative democracy in order to gain a better understanding how the two ministries understand citizen participation, how they implement these processes, and what effects they have on formal decision-making. Using interviews, participant observation, and document analysis, we investigate two processes of citizen participation in depth. We argue that ministerial understandings of citizen participation determine how they design formats in their respective field. This leads to quite divergent implementations and results of deliberative-participatory formats in the field of foreign policy, depending on whether the AA or the BMU initiates them.

The Future of Open Government

“…Digital engagement tools not only enable the submission of feedback and proposals from the public; they also facilitate greater transparency in the decisionmaking process itself. When citizens can observe and contribute to policy formulation in virtual environments, it engenders a more democratic form of governance where decisions are a reflection of wide-ranging citizen input (C. Oliveira, 2019;Pfeifer et al, 2021). The construction and adoption of policies become more than a statutory requirement; they transform into a shared venture between government and governed.…”

Decision‐makers, advisers or educable subjects? Policymakers' perceptions of citizen participation in a Nordic democracy

“…Moreover, policymakers from different policy areas may hold different attitudes. Comparing the practices for citizen participation in foreign policy and environmental policy in Germany, Pfeifer et al (2021) found the latter to be a more fruitful setting for citizen involvement. Using interviews, participant observations and official documents, the authors concluded that while foreign policy may require the kind of expertise that citizens seldom can possess, they are typically much better equipped to handle environmental issues.…”

The Role of Political Parties Under Deliberative Democracy in China

“…Furthermore, political parties can serve as conduits for gathering public preferences and turning deliberative decisions into policy recommendations. By pushing for the inclusion of deliberative results in policy-making processes, they help bridge the gap between public deliberation and policy implementation (Pfeifer et al, 2021).…”