2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delineating the complex use of a political podcast in South Korea by hybrid web indicators: The case of the Nakkomsu Twitter network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twitter's role in political communication in different parts of the world, especially around elections and campaigning, has increasingly been studied in recent years (Weller et al, 2014). Such studies have generally examined the use of Twitter as a communication channel for social protests (Penney and Dadas, 2014), political election campaigns (Enli, 2017;Heo et al, 2016;Jungherr, 2016;Jungherr et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2016;McGregor, 2018;Ott, 2017;Park et al, 2016), and revolutionary movements during political upheavals (Lotan et al, 2011). In these contexts, Twitter has been used either by politicians (parties and candidates) as a platform for self-representation, or by citizens or ''Twitter publics'' (Jungherr, 2016), as a communication tool for arranging social and political movements (Anstead and Chadwick, 2018;Ceron, 2017;Engesser et al, 2017).…”
Section: Twitter As a Medium For Political Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Twitter's role in political communication in different parts of the world, especially around elections and campaigning, has increasingly been studied in recent years (Weller et al, 2014). Such studies have generally examined the use of Twitter as a communication channel for social protests (Penney and Dadas, 2014), political election campaigns (Enli, 2017;Heo et al, 2016;Jungherr, 2016;Jungherr et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2016;McGregor, 2018;Ott, 2017;Park et al, 2016), and revolutionary movements during political upheavals (Lotan et al, 2011). In these contexts, Twitter has been used either by politicians (parties and candidates) as a platform for self-representation, or by citizens or ''Twitter publics'' (Jungherr, 2016), as a communication tool for arranging social and political movements (Anstead and Chadwick, 2018;Ceron, 2017;Engesser et al, 2017).…”
Section: Twitter As a Medium For Political Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also demonstrate that the landscape of Korean Twitter during televised debates favored the opposition candidate. In a similar study, Kim et al (2016) discuss the role of Twitter in a hybrid media system in the context of elections. They discuss how Twitter was used for direct interaction among users of social media and the listeners of a popular political podcast.…”
Section: Twitter As a Medium For Political Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates the influence of a participant in the online social network [ 18 ]. Some researchers have also used ‘in-degree’ to identify hubs in the online discussion network [ 39 ]. Empirical results show that degree centrality is the most effective indicator of the structural importance of a participant in the social network [ 40 ].…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second screening for news affords users the ability to publicly criticize mass media and political elites (D’heer & Verdegem, 2015; Freelon & Karpf, 2015; Pond, 2016). To a certain extent, news organizations and political elites respond to this criticism by reshaping their content or talking points (Anstead & O’Loughlin, 2011, 2015; Chadwick, Dennis, & Smith, 2016), even though second screeners represent a vocal minority (Bentivegna & Marchetti, 2015) who generally respond to mass media content (Kim, Lee, & Park, 2016; Vergeer & Franses, 2016; Wells et al, 2016). Thus, scholars have described second screening for news as a complex interplay between media industries and audiences (Barry & Doherty, 2017; Moe, Poell, & van Dijck, 2016), and this interplay implies that second screening behaviors may be especially meaningful in terms of the influence those behaviors have on media and political organizations or institutions.…”
Section: Second Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%