2020
DOI: 10.3934/neuroscience.2020001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delirium screening in the intensive care unit using emerging QEEG techniques: A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Median EEG duration was 0.5 hours (0.3-30). The majority of patients (64%) were under continuous sedation during EEG, with propofol and/or midazolam; their median duration of mechanical ventilation was 8 days (4-14) and the median ICU stay was 11 days (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Median EEG duration was 0.5 hours (0.3-30). The majority of patients (64%) were under continuous sedation during EEG, with propofol and/or midazolam; their median duration of mechanical ventilation was 8 days (4-14) and the median ICU stay was 11 days (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EEG is part of standard diagnostic procedures of acute alteration of consciousness in the ICU, and may therefore prove useful to contribute to delirium diagnosis (7)(8)(9). Yet, clinical data on EEG in ICU delirium is limited (10,11), and to our knowledge, a comprehensive analysis of EEG characteristics in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients at high delirium risk has not been explored so far, especially in adults without known acute brain injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to confounding factors, eight of 33 studies (24.2%) excluded patients with dementia [35,43,49,52,59,64,65]; six (18.2%) included subjects with dementia and studied differences in EEG between patients with delirium, with dementia, and with both conditions [41, 60-62, 66, 71]; four (12.1%) included subjects with dementia but did not take this into account in their analyses [42,50,56,57]; 15 (45.5%) did not mention whether subjects with dementia were included [44, 46-48, 51, 53-55, 58, 63, 67-70, 72]. Furthermore, six studies (18.2%) did not include patients with alcohol/substance abuse [41,49,59,62,67,71]; three (9.1%) included patients with alcohol/substance abuse and took this into account in their analysis [46,58,66]; six (18.2%) included patients with alcohol/substance abuse but did not consider this in the [50,[54][55][56][57]69]; 18 (54.5%) did not mention whether patients with alcohol/substance abuse were included [35, 42-45, 47, 48, 51-53, 60, 61, 63-65, 68, 70, 72].…”
Section: Study and Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others averaged electrodes of anatomical regions to search for differences. Six studies [35,42,50,62,65,67] used two-or three-electrode derivations. More speci cally, Hunter et al [65], van der Kooi et al [35], and Fleischmann et al [42] examined different derivations among all included electrodes, while Koponen et al [62], Matsushima et al [67], and Numan et al [50] just analyzed the T6-O2 or T5-O1 derivation, the C3-O1 derivation, or Fp2-Pz and T8-Pz derivations, respectively.…”
Section: Quantitativementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation