Delivering Healthcare Information via the Internet: Cardiac Patients' Access, Usage, Perceptions of Usefulness, and Web Site Content Preferences

Abstract

Objectives: To assess patients' usage of the Internet as a source of personal healthcare information and patients' perceptions of usefulness and content preferences of more locally focused online health-related material. Materials and Methods: A paper-based survey was undertaken by a convenience sample of cardiac outpatients. Age, gender, Internet access, Internet usage, perception of usefulness of online information, predicted intention to use a local cardiology Web site if available, and preferred components to be included were recorded. Univariate and bivariate statistics were used. Results: Two hundred thirty-seven patients responded (62.1% males). One hundred seventysix (74.3%) used the Internet, with 126 (63%) using it daily. For patients who did not have direct access to the Internet, 26 (50%) had a family member to do this on their behalf. Thus, the majority of patients (202 [85%]) had access to the Internet at home or someone who could access it on their behalf. Internet usage declined with age (Kendall's tau_b = 0.321, p < 0.001). There was no difference in use with gender (p = 0.235). There was considerable interest expressed in a locally delivered Web-based information service. Conclusions: Online healthcare information services have the potential to reach the vast majority of cardiac patients either directly or through family support. The most elderly patients are less likely to use these services. Despite apparent satisfaction with existing online resources, there appears to be an unmet need for more information and considerable support for a locally based cardiac patient Web resource to deliver this. These findings may help guide future patient information Web site redesign.

Influence of Generational Cohorts on the Preferences for Information and Communication Technologies in Latin American Patients with Obstructive Lung Diseases

“…found that Generation Z and Millennials had the highest rate of Internet access among all generations, followed by a progressive decline as patient's age increased. e latter finding has been previously reported regarding chronic diseases in older patients who were found to use less ICTs and have lower reported Internet access compared to younger cohorts [22][23][24]. should be noted including the potential misunderstandings due to typos or interpretation errors, possible medical-legal claims without adequate insurance coverage, and lack of reimbursement policies, which could compromise and complicate the patient-doctor relationship [7].…”

Online health information seeking by adults hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes: Who looks for information, and who discusses it with healthcare providers?

“…Patients with larger social support networks may have greater availability of friends or family who help them seek answers to their health and healthcare questions online, refer them to useful or evidence-based online resources, or provide logistic or technical support for these activities. [28–30] In this study, only participants who reported Internet use were asked about online health information-seeking and communication with providers, and it is possible that some of the 43% of TRACE-CORE participants who do not themselves use the Internet may be obtaining health information from online sources through family or friends. Given the prevalence of “surrogate information seeking”,[28] we encourage clinicians to not assume that their “offline” patients do not have access to the Internet as a health information resource, and to phrase questions about health information seeking from other sources broadly.…”

Web Health Monitoring Survey: A New Approach to Enhance the Effectiveness of Telemedicine Systems

“…In more general terms, the digital skills of potential respondents to a WHMS is a challenge: a sample of patients with chronic conditions would be older, and the greater digital divide in this group could be a barrier to their participation in such a survey [ 38 - 40 ].…”