1990
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3835(90)90139-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delivery of the tumour photosensitizer zinc(II)-phthalocyanine to serum proteins by different liposomes: studies in vitro and in vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be related to the fact that the presence of two cholesterol moieties brings about only a marginal increase (27% vs 20-24%) in the fraction of LDL-bound GePc as compared with other hydrophobic porphyrin or phthalocyanine derivatives (Kongshaug et al, 1990;Jori & Reddi, 1993). On the contrary, the addition of cholesterol to the liposome carrier has been shown to increase the amount of Zn(II) phthalocyanine associated with LDL (up to 33%; Ginevra et al, 1990). Thus, it appears that manipulation of the photosensitiser molecule has a relatively minor effect on its distribution among the components of the lipoprotein family; rather, the photosensitiser transfer to lipoproteins is mainly controlled by the properties of the delivery system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be related to the fact that the presence of two cholesterol moieties brings about only a marginal increase (27% vs 20-24%) in the fraction of LDL-bound GePc as compared with other hydrophobic porphyrin or phthalocyanine derivatives (Kongshaug et al, 1990;Jori & Reddi, 1993). On the contrary, the addition of cholesterol to the liposome carrier has been shown to increase the amount of Zn(II) phthalocyanine associated with LDL (up to 33%; Ginevra et al, 1990). Thus, it appears that manipulation of the photosensitiser molecule has a relatively minor effect on its distribution among the components of the lipoprotein family; rather, the photosensitiser transfer to lipoproteins is mainly controlled by the properties of the delivery system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein pattern of rabbit serum is much closer to that typical of human serum as compared with mouse or rat serum (Gotto et al, 1986), hence the information thus obtained can be more directly extrapolated to humans. Previous studies (Ginevra et al, 1990) showed that in vitro data obtained with human serum are substantially different from in vivo data with rabbit serum; such a difference is likely to reflect a dynamic process occurring in vivo in which the photosensitiser is delivered from serum proteins to tissues.…”
Section: Transport Of Gepc In Rabbit Serummentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Henderson and Mayhew (1990) observed a good response of subcutaneously implanted RIF (radiation induced fibrosarcoma) in iso-BOSiNc treated mice to light doses (135 J cm2, 75-100 mW cm-2) lower than those used in the present I study. This can be explained by several differences existing between the two experimental protocols: the tumour type and location (intramuscolar vs subcutaneous) often cause different levels of photosensitivity; moreover, the liposomal carriers of iso-BOSiNc were different, which may result in different modalities of photosensitiser transport in the serum and different distribution of the photosensitiser among the tissular compartments (Ginevra et al, 1990). Actually, Henderson and Mayhew (1990) found a large extent of PDT-induced vascular damage in their tumour animal model, while ultrastructural studies on tissue specimens taken from the irradiated MS-2 fibrosarcoma demonstrate a highly preferential direct damage of malignant cells (Jori & Cuomo, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Albeit such changes may result in a decrease in their in vivo photoactivity, mono-and di-sulphonated derivatives are capable of cell membrane penetration resulting in increased potency to inflict direct cell kill during PDT (Brasseur et al., 1988;Paquette and van Lier, 1992;Margaron et al, 1996). Among the non-substituted Pcs, the zinc complex (ZnPc) has been studied in great detail (Ginevra et al, 1990;Reddi et al, 1990). Owing to its extreme insolubility in most common solvents, ZnPc needs to be incorporated in liposomes, and a proprietary formulation has been proposed for clinical use (Schieweck et al, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%