1998
DOI: 10.3141/1623-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demand Forecasting Model for Park-and-Ride Lots in King County, Washington

Abstract: As the demand for using park-and-ride lots grows, the need to accurately forecast these trips also grows. Initially, demand for park-and-ride lots was forecast using a technique that identified the draw area for each lot and estimated demand without regard to capacity. These were simplifying assumptions that are no longer appropriate with respect to current demand for park-and-ride lots. In King County, Washington, the 12 largest park-and-ride lots are currently operating at 95 percent utilization. According t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Spillar (1 997) has provided a comprehensive review of park-and-ride models and techniques, including ad hoc approaches that were used in the mid-80s when land was relatively inexpensive, market shed approaches that are commonly used for evaluating individual park-and-ride sites, and advanced mathematical modeling approaches. Other efforts in park-and-ride demand modeling have largely focused on capacity constraint issues (Spiess, 1993;Hendrick and Outwater, 1998;Hull, 1998), which emphasize setting an upper bound to park-and-ride use. These models are robust in their ability to distribute park-and-ride demand to different park-and-ride stations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Spillar (1 997) has provided a comprehensive review of park-and-ride models and techniques, including ad hoc approaches that were used in the mid-80s when land was relatively inexpensive, market shed approaches that are commonly used for evaluating individual park-and-ride sites, and advanced mathematical modeling approaches. Other efforts in park-and-ride demand modeling have largely focused on capacity constraint issues (Spiess, 1993;Hendrick and Outwater, 1998;Hull, 1998), which emphasize setting an upper bound to park-and-ride use. These models are robust in their ability to distribute park-and-ride demand to different park-and-ride stations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential solution to address this problem is to increase the number of parking spaces; however, doing so is expensive and can be unpopular in some neighborhoods. Instead, agencies are beginning to recognize the need for other types of parking management strategies at park-and-rides to increase the number of people that are able to use the overutilized facilities to access transit (Habib et al 2013;Hendricks and Outwater 1998). Agencies are considering strategies that prioritize multiple-occupant vehicles over single-occupant vehicles (SOV) so that the same number of spaces can serve more people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is extensive literature on the combination of bicycles and the metro, and the number is growing rapidly. Multiple articles have summarized a range of bicycle-metro integration topics, including the travel characteristics of integrated bicycle-metro trips [8,10,[15][16][17], the accessibility of the bicycle-metro system [18][19][20][21], bicycle parking issues at railway stations [22,23], the bicycle-metro demand forecast [24][25][26], and the determinants of general bicycle-metro integration [8,16,[27][28][29][30]. However, the emphasis of this literature review is on the integration of bikeshare with the metro.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%