2003
DOI: 10.1353/jod.2003.0059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Democracy, Dictatorship, and Infant Mortality Revisited

Abstract: This article updates our earlier finding that democracies outperformed dictatorships in 1950-90 by achieving lower infant mortality rates at every level of development. Now we show that this holds even post-Cold War and after the latest wave of democratization. Using 1990-97 data, we again find that democracies outdo dictatorships, though the difference is somewhat smaller now. One key finding is relevant to policymakers: foreign direct investment and aid both significantly reduce IMRs in democracies, but not … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This incentive, coupled with the presence of a free press, suggests that food shortages become matters of public debate and issues requiring urgent action. Navia and Zweifel [2003] find that democratic rule has an independent effect on the level of infant mortality across countries: holding all else constant, the level of infant mortality is higher in authoritarian regimes than in democracies.…”
Section: Alternative Measures Of Developmentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This incentive, coupled with the presence of a free press, suggests that food shortages become matters of public debate and issues requiring urgent action. Navia and Zweifel [2003] find that democratic rule has an independent effect on the level of infant mortality across countries: holding all else constant, the level of infant mortality is higher in authoritarian regimes than in democracies.…”
Section: Alternative Measures Of Developmentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These gains confirmed a trend that had also characterizsed the previous decades in Pakistan as well as globally: worldwide, in the latter half of the twentieth century infant-mortality rate dropped from 156 in 1950 to 57 in 1999 as a product of a United Nations agenda focusing on Health for All and primary health care. 33 But, as Table 4 indicates, in other countries of the region, both autocratic and democratic, decreases were actually more dramatic, with the consequence that mortality rates in Pakistan at the end of the decade remained very high when compared to other countries, including those with similar per capita income or similar rate of growth. Significantly, while Pakistan in the 1970s had lower mortality rates than all countries in the region with the exception of Sri Lanka, two decades later it had the highest rates.…”
Section: Health and Education Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies show that fertility is highly correlated with infant mortality (Przeworski et al, 2000;Navia & Zweifel, 2003) and this is usually explained by the insurance model in which parents have many children because the risk of them dying at a young age is very high. To control for this relationship in our model, we employ data from WDI on the fertility rate measured as the number of births per woman (World Bank, 2013).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%