Democracy, Law and Governance

Lenoble, Jacques; Maesschalck, Marc

doi:10.4324/9781315576435

Cited by 11 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Another important literature we are building upon is that of models of RRI governance [11][12][13]. This literature proposes the following four models of RRI governance.…”

Section: The Models Of Rri Governancementioning

confidence: 99%

Governance of Responsible Research and Innovation: An Agent-Based Model Approach

Paredes-Frigolett

Gomes

Pereira

2015

Procedia Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Responsible research and innovation is a new research field that is still emerging, particularly in connection with recent efforts within the European Commission. Inspired in these recent developments, we put forth the first agent-based model of responsible research and innovation (RRI). The model has been designed as a decision-aiding tool for both policymakers driving innovation policy and innovation managers facing the complex trade-offs posed by the involvement of civil society organizations in innovation agendas. The model allows policymakers and innovation strategists to inform and guide public policies and strategic decisions regarding the governance of responsible research and innovation.

show abstract

“…Another important literature we are building upon is that of models of RRI governance [11][12][13]. This literature proposes the following four models of RRI governance.…”

Section: The Models Of Rri Governancementioning

confidence: 99%

Governance of Responsible Research and Innovation: An Agent-Based Model Approach

Paredes-Frigolett

Gomes

Pereira

2015

Procedia Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This form is often highlighted in transdisciplinary approaches. Exemplifying the collaborative components are Popa et al (2015:47), where they highlight "a collaborative process of acknowledgement, critical deliberation and mutual learning on values, assumptions and understandings that enables the generation of 'new meanings, new heuristics, and new stakeholder identities'" (quotation within attributed to Lenoble and Maesschalck 2010). https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss4/art20/ To keep the typology simple yet precise, we use the one by because it delineates only three forms of reflexivity: personal, functional, and disciplinary.…”

Section: Reflexivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Finding an academic space: reflexivity among sustainability researchers

Knaggård¹,

Ness²,

Harnesk³

2018

E&S

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reflexivity is arguably an important aspect of doing sustainability research. The inter-and transdisciplinary character of sustainability research, as well as its change-oriented agenda, require scholars to reflect on their role as researchers, their research focus and methodology, and its relation to academia and society. Using focus groups with 15 researchers at different stages in their academic career, we investigate three forms of reflexivity, i.e., personal, functional, and disciplinary, for sustainability researchers connected to the LUCID (Lund University Centre of Excellence for the Integration of the Social and Natural Dimensions of Sustainability) program experience. We further study similarities and differences in how the researchers experience reflexivity connected to interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches. We find that sustainability researchers experience all three forms of reflexivity. In particular, they are highly reflexive about how research on sustainability issues is dependent on theoretical pluralism; how research can contribute to the transformation of society; and how they, as inter-and transdisciplinary researchers, can construct a space for themselves within the academic system. We also find that transdisciplinary approaches make scholars add a layer of reflexivity to the three categories studied, concerning collaboration beyond academia. Finally, we find that reflexivity about these issues seems to be crucial for how sustainability researchers construct a space for themselves within the academic system. PhD graduates from the LUCID program are deeply reflexive about the function of academic boundaries. It is this awareness that enables them to construct an academic identity entirely beyond boundaries. This result has important implications for PhD programs focused toward sustainability issues, in terms of a need to provide opportunities for PhD students to develop reflexivity.

show abstract

“…Yet there has been increasing concern about the forms of procurement and provision associated with this privatisation and contracting, especially in relation to its capacity to effectively provide services in the public interest. In response to these concerns there has been an increasing focus on developing forms of collaborative and relational contracting and partnership working in public services in general (see for instance, Kelly 2007, Lenoble & Maesschalck 2010, de Schutter & Lenoble 2010, Vincent Jones 2013.…”

Section: On Relational Contracting and Collaborative Partnership Workingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One risk of this approach is the fairly straightforward point that avoiding contractual ambiguity is a difficult matter. As many authors have argued, it is almost inevitable that a contract will fail to provide adequate specification to cover every aspect of service delivery, not least because the few people designing the contract will not (cannot) have full knowledge of everything that may happen in relation to the service (see for instance Gilson et al 2010, Lenoble & Maesschalck 2010, Sabel 1994, Van Slyke 2009. Moreover, this approach presents a barrier to learning, and importantly also the application of learning, in the lifetime of the contract.…”

Section: On Relational Contracting and Collaborative Partnership Workingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The idea is that contracting parties agree to a partnership involving high level goals, and to a processes of decision making throughout the course of the project which involve collaboration and deliberation aimed at working out how to deliver a service which meets those goals while providing fair terms for the provider (see e.g. Gilson et al 2010, Lenoble & Maesschalck 2010, Vincent-Jones 2013, Vincent-Jones & Mullen 2010). 1 So the contracts are less highly specified and more reliant on process.…”

Section: On Relational Contracting and Collaborative Partnership Workingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Partnerships between operators and public transport authorities. Working practices in relational contracting and collaborative partnerships

Hrelja

Rye

Mullen

2018

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent research on public transport has seen increasing focus on issues like coordination, collaboration and steering in complex governance settings. One of the themes in this field of research is related to partnership approaches, as one way of stimulating functioning collaboration between formally independent private and public organisations. The aim of this paper is to explore the role and function of partnerships as a way of supporting wellfunctioning public transport networks and services in fragmented institutional settings. The empirical focus is on partnerships between operators and public (transport) authorities in two different legal settings: England and Sweden. The analysis is based on interviews with operators and public transport authorities in two metropolitan regions in each country where innovative partnership working has been developed to deal with various types of barriers to delivering better public transport. The results show the key qualities of these partnerships that are required for them to function. Although the regulatory contexts are very different, the partnership qualities are very similar in both cases.

show abstract

Democracy, Law and Governance

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Governance of Responsible Research and Innovation: An Agent-Based Model Approach

Governance of Responsible Research and Innovation: An Agent-Based Model Approach

Finding an academic space: reflexivity among sustainability researchers

Partnerships between operators and public transport authorities. Working practices in relational contracting and collaborative partnerships

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About