“…Most studies enrolled febrile patients (5838 cases) (10/15, 66.7%) [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], malaria-positive patients (421 cases) [ 32 , 38 , 42 ], and one study enrolled both febrile and non-febrile individuals (1193 cases) [ 35 ]. Most of the included studies enrolled adult patients (7/15, 46.7%) [ 26 , 30 , 34 , 37 , 38 , 41 , 42 ], all age groups (5/15, 33.3%) [ 31 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 39 ], and age not specified, by Mandage et al [ 32 ]. For malaria diagnosis, most of the included studies used a gold standard “microscopy” alone (8/15, 53.3%) [ 26 , 29 , 30 , 33 , 36 , 38 , 41 , 42 ], microscopy/RDT/PCR (3/15, 20%) [ 32 , 35 , 39 ], microscopy/RDT [ 34 ] ELISA [ 31 ] microscopic agglutination test (MAT) [ 40 ], and RDT [ 37 ].…”