2017
DOI: 10.1111/oik.04065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demographic influences of translocated individuals on a resident population of house sparrows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is necessary to have some idea of the likely acclimation period when making inferences about post-release effects. In studies that explicitly account for post-release effects (Table 1), the standard approach is to nominate a fixed acclimation period and either i) exclude survival data over that period (e.g., Normande et al, 2015;Ashbrook et al, 2016;Ranke et al, 2017), or ii) use model selection criteria to test whether survival differs from normal survival over that period, and differentiate the two if the difference is significant (e.g., Bertolero and Oro, 2009;Cochran-Biederman et al, 2015;Yu et al, 2015). In contrast, Tuberville et al (2008) and Panfylova et al (2016) used a more flexible approach whereby they nominated two alternative acclimation periods and used model averaging to incorporate this source of uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to have some idea of the likely acclimation period when making inferences about post-release effects. In studies that explicitly account for post-release effects (Table 1), the standard approach is to nominate a fixed acclimation period and either i) exclude survival data over that period (e.g., Normande et al, 2015;Ashbrook et al, 2016;Ranke et al, 2017), or ii) use model selection criteria to test whether survival differs from normal survival over that period, and differentiate the two if the difference is significant (e.g., Bertolero and Oro, 2009;Cochran-Biederman et al, 2015;Yu et al, 2015). In contrast, Tuberville et al (2008) and Panfylova et al (2016) used a more flexible approach whereby they nominated two alternative acclimation periods and used model averaging to incorporate this source of uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed a simplified multievent capture–mark–resight model to estimate survival ( S ) and transition probabilities (ψ) from an individual's natal location to their first breeding location, allowing for uncertainty in an adult's state assignment (δ) but without any uncertainty in initial state assignment (Pradel, 2005; Figure 2a). We used a hierarchical Bayesian multievent model (Kéry & Schaub, 2012; Ranke et al, 2017) based on the parameterization of the multievent model by Pradel (2005). Our simplified model structure included four parameters as there was no uncertainty of state assignment at initial capture for hatch‐year chicks: S —the probability of survival for individuals in state i from time t to t+1Sti; ψ—the probability of transitioning from state i to state j between times t and t + 1 given that it survives at time tψtij; p —the probability of being detected at time t given that it is in state i at time tpti; and δ—the probability that, given it is encountered, the state is assigned correctly δti|i.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above individual is shown carrying nestbuilding materials, en route to the nest site (photo by P. S. Ranke). probabilities across a large geographic area (Jensen et al, 2013;Kvalnes et al, 2017;Nafstad et al, 2023;Ranke et al, 2017Ranke et al, , 2020, have additionally contributed to documenting rare dispersal events, and our intensive field campaign contributes to about half of our documented long-distance dispersal events. Moreover, color-ringed individuals would be more conspicuous and easier to detect also for local inhabitants, which might additionally increase detection probabilities of individuals from our study populations.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 and 300 km south of the main study metapopulation during the years 2001-2022 (in total ca. 11,750 house sparrows ringed; Kvalnes et al, 2017;Nafstad et al, 2023;Ranke et al, 2017Ranke et al, , 2020Stubberud et al, 2017), combined with regular ringing recoveries by local inhabitants (Bakken et al, 2006), allow us to explore patterns in a high number of individual house sparrow movements across long periods of time and over large geographical distances, which exceed those of our main study metapopulation (see Figure 1). Here, we aim to describe and document such long-distance dispersal events in reference to the dispersal dynamics within a metapopulation of house sparrows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%