2013 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/irps.2013.6532088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstrating distribution of SILC values at individual leakage spots

Abstract: Stress induced leakage current (SILC) in the order of 10 -17 to 10 -13 A were statistically evaluated by using an advanced test circuit. In this paper, the distribution of SILC was evaluated by changing measurement electric fields, electric stress intensities, device area, and oxide thickness. The distribution of SILC is determined by the current values at individual leakage spots when the device area is sufficiently small. When the electric stress intensity and the measurement field are small, the distributio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basically, RTS is caused by one or a few traps, and RTS is often observed in SILC. 24) These indicate that SILC has a strong relationship with the density of electron traps. It is considered that SILC is caused by the traps or is generated in a very small area that can be strongly influenced by electrons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Basically, RTS is caused by one or a few traps, and RTS is often observed in SILC. 24) These indicate that SILC has a strong relationship with the density of electron traps. It is considered that SILC is caused by the traps or is generated in a very small area that can be strongly influenced by electrons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…25) The measurements were carried out at −30 °C in order to accurately measure the gate current down to 10 −17 A. [21][22][23][24] The measured samples were fabricated using 0.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations