1997
DOI: 10.1080/02796015.1997.12085877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstration as a Reading Intervention for Exceptional Learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that it may be better to reduce, not increase, oral reading rates when the goal is to increase students' reading accuracy. In fact, Skinner, Logan, Robinson, and Robinson (1997) concluded that reading aloud at rates above a student's baseline oral reading rate may deter increases in reading accuracy and fluency. Of note, students were exposed only to previewing rates that were approximately equal to or significantly greater than their baseline reading rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that it may be better to reduce, not increase, oral reading rates when the goal is to increase students' reading accuracy. In fact, Skinner, Logan, Robinson, and Robinson (1997) concluded that reading aloud at rates above a student's baseline oral reading rate may deter increases in reading accuracy and fluency. Of note, students were exposed only to previewing rates that were approximately equal to or significantly greater than their baseline reading rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skill mastery requires students to be both accurate and rapid (Haring & Eaton, 1978; Skinner, 1998). Although a variety of instructional techniques can be used to improve students’ accuracy, providing more opportunities to practice (also referred to as increasing learning trials [Albers & Greer, 1991; Belfiore, Skinner, & Ferkis, 1995], increasing opportunities to respond [Greenwood et al, 1987; Skinner, Turco, Beatty, & Rasavage, 1989], and/or increasing academic learning time [Berliner, 1984; Rosenshine & Berliner, 1978]) may be the most common procedures for increasing speed of accurate responding (Haring & Eaton, 1978; Skinner, Logan, Robinson, & Robinson, 1998). In addition to increasing rates of accurate responding or fluency, increasing opportunities to respond has also been used to facilitate skill maintenance and generalization (Ivarie, 1986; Skinner, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%