shows rather high carrier mobility at room temperature (≈320 cm 2 V −1 s −1 ). [3,4] The crystal structure of BaSnO 3 is cubic perovskite type, ABO 3 with space group of Pm-3m (a = 0.4116 nm), and the A-site can be fully substituted with Sr (SrSnO 3 ), though the crystal structure is orthorhombic perovskite with space group of Pbnm (a = 0.57082 nm, b = 0.57035 nm, c = 0.80659 nm). [5] The bandgap of SrSnO 3 is ≈4.1 eV [2] and the La-doped SrSnO 3 films also show high carrier mobility (40-55 cm 2 V −1 s −1 [6,7] ) at room temperature. Thus, BaSnO 3 -SrSnO 3 solid-solutions (E g = 3.1-4.1 eV) [8] are good candidates to realize large bandgap (≈4 eV) TOS-based TFTs. Very recently, a metal-semiconductor TFT operating as depletion-mode has been reported by Chaganti et al. [9] They used the La-doped SrSnO 3 film as the channel layer. However, the TFT performance of undoped BaSnO 3 -SrSnO 3 solid-solutions, which would be better to fabricate an accumulation-mode TFT, has not been reported thus far probably due to the lack of fundamental knowledge especially the effective thickness (t eff ) and the carrier effective mass (m*), which are essential information to design the TFTs.Although several researchers have reported on the m* of SrSnO 3 , the reported m* values are scattered ranging from 0.14 to 4 m 0 . In 2007, Hadjarab et al. [10] measured the magnetic susceptibility of Sr 0.98 La 0.02 SnO 3−δ ceramic and extracted m* of 4 m 0 . Moreira et al. [11,12] and Liu et al. [13] performed the band structure calculation of SrSnO 3 and BaSnO 3 , and reported much lighter m* values; SrSnO 3 : m* = 0.14-0.23 m 0 , BaSnO 3 : 0.03-0.20 m 0 . Recently, Ong et al. [14] reported that the m* of SrSnO 3 is ≈0.4 m 0 , whereas the calculated effective mass of BaSnO 3 is m* = 0.26 m 0 with the same method. Generally, the m* of n-type TOS, in which the conduction band is composed of ns orbitals, strongly depends on the overlap integral of the neighboring ns orbitals. [15] Further, the overlap integral of ns orbitals would be insensitive to the bond angle. [16] If this assumption is correct, since the interatomic distances of neighboring Sn ions in SrSnO 3 and BaSnO 3 crystals are 0.4035 and 0.4116 nm, respectively, the m* of SrSnO 3 should be lighter than that of BaSnO 3 , which is in opposite relationship with the band calculation results. [11][12][13]