2008
DOI: 10.21236/ada479039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstration of GSSHA Hydrology at Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed

Abstract: PURPOSE:The purpose of this System-Wide Water Resources (SWWRP) technical note is to describe the application of the Gridded Surface Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis (GSSHA) model at the Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW). The purpose of applying the model at this site was to confirm that the hydrologic portions of the code were working properly and were able to achieve accurate results. Application of GSSHA at this site also allows the current model to be compared and contrasted with the performance of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that the depths of the sheet runoff are much smaller than the microtopographic irregularities over the fields, the calibrated n represents not only the bed resistance but also form drags due to the microbed forms, crop residue, and vegetation. This n value agrees with the recent runoff studies [25,31,49] in cases of overland flows, including those in the Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed in Northern Mississippi. There are numerous trees, bushes, and weeds growing along and within the channel, thus, n =0.16m À1/3 s was used for the channel and kept unchanged for other rain event cases.…”
Section: Application To a Real Watershed Mathematical Modelsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that the depths of the sheet runoff are much smaller than the microtopographic irregularities over the fields, the calibrated n represents not only the bed resistance but also form drags due to the microbed forms, crop residue, and vegetation. This n value agrees with the recent runoff studies [25,31,49] in cases of overland flows, including those in the Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed in Northern Mississippi. There are numerous trees, bushes, and weeds growing along and within the channel, thus, n =0.16m À1/3 s was used for the channel and kept unchanged for other rain event cases.…”
Section: Application To a Real Watershed Mathematical Modelsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…CCHE2D is a physically based model, which treats the entire watershed including the channels and ditches as one continuous domain. One does not need to differentiate overland sheet flow and channel flow calculation areas using grid cells and 1D channel networks as is done in GSSHA [31], WASH123D [32], NIKE-SHE [33], and SHETRAN [34]. It is also not necessary to employ arbitrarily shaped subwatersheds and 1D channel networks as is done in the CCHE1D model [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate the capture and storage capabilities of simplified BMPs, we used a retention function. The retention function stores a specified depth of water on specific cells (Downer, 2008;Downer & Ogden, 2006). We determined the depth of storage based on local guidelines for bioretention cells (see Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GSSHA. Gridded Surface and Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis (GSSHA) is a two-dimensional, physics-based numerical simulation model created with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Downer andOgden, 2003, 2004) to perform hydrologic analysis at high-resolution with spatially distributed results. Once calibrated, a GSSHA simulation model is ideal for evaluating changing conditions and forecasts at a local level.…”
Section: Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GSSHA was tested in the System Wide Water Resources Program at the Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed that has an area of 21.2 km 2 (Downer, 2008). The parameter assignment and calibration in GSSHA were tested in this small (21.2 km 2 ) agricultural watershed located in northeast Mississippi, near Basteville (Downer andOgden, 2003, 2004). Another study was carried out to validate the capability of distributed models to simulate complex problems in comparison to the Hydrologic Modeling System (HMS) (USACE, 2015) lumped and semi-distributed Clark models in the simulation of land use change scenarios and its effects in response for a 113.96 km 2 watershed in Tifton, Georgia (Paudel, 2010).…”
Section: Downscaling Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%