2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cagd.2015.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Denoising point sets via L0 minimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, other local fitting approaches have also been used for point cloud denoising, using robust jet‐fitting with re‐projection [CP05, CP07] or various forms of bilateral filtering on point clouds [HWG*13, DDF17], which take into account both point coordinates and normal directions for better preservation of edge features. A closely related set of techniques is based on sparse representation of the point normals for better feature preservation [ASGCO10, SSW15, MC17]. Denoising is then achieved by projecting the points onto the estimated local surfaces.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, other local fitting approaches have also been used for point cloud denoising, using robust jet‐fitting with re‐projection [CP05, CP07] or various forms of bilateral filtering on point clouds [HWG*13, DDF17], which take into account both point coordinates and normal directions for better preservation of edge features. A closely related set of techniques is based on sparse representation of the point normals for better feature preservation [ASGCO10, SSW15, MC17]. Denoising is then achieved by projecting the points onto the estimated local surfaces.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a higher robustness to outliers is usually obtained using a larger neighborhood, which makes sharp features even smoother. Minimizing the ℓ 1 [ASGCO10] or ℓ 0 norm [SSW15] is robust to sharp features but quite slow. Moving least squares [ABCO*03, PKKG03] and local kernel regression [ÖGG09] estimate normals as the gradient of an implicit surface, preserving sharp features, but requiring reliable normal priors as input.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 (a)). This side-effect is also encountered in [LWC * 18] and [SSW15] for the reason that points near edges are attracted to and accumulated around edges in order to achieve the minimal value of Eq. 9.…”
Section: Position Updatingmentioning
confidence: 90%