2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/icra46639.2022.9811966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DenseTact: Optical Tactile Sensor for Dense Shape Reconstruction

Abstract: Collaborative robots stand to have an immense impact both on human welfare in domestic service applications and industrial superiority in advanced manufacturing requires dexterous assembly. The outstanding challenge is providing robotic fingertips with a physical design that makes them adept at performing dexterous tasks that require high-resolution, calibrated shape reconstruction and force sensing. In this work, we present DenseTact 2.0, an optical-tactile sensor capable of visualizing the deformed surface o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, the deforming surface (soft sensing surface) has markers or pins arranged on its inner surface, whose displacements are recorded by the camera [32,[56][57][58][59][60][61]. Apart from using pins or markers, the imprints of the external object on the sensing skin are captured by the camera in certain sensors [62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. Compared to other transduction methods discussed above, the camerabased method calls for a bigger form factor of the sensor, as it has to house a camera with its illumination provisions and also needs to place the camera away from the sensing surface to obtain a better view of the surface.…”
Section: Camera/vision Basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the deforming surface (soft sensing surface) has markers or pins arranged on its inner surface, whose displacements are recorded by the camera [32,[56][57][58][59][60][61]. Apart from using pins or markers, the imprints of the external object on the sensing skin are captured by the camera in certain sensors [62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. Compared to other transduction methods discussed above, the camerabased method calls for a bigger form factor of the sensor, as it has to house a camera with its illumination provisions and also needs to place the camera away from the sensing surface to obtain a better view of the surface.…”
Section: Camera/vision Basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In real-world robotic tasks, the robots usually require different non-planar shapes of tactile sensor surfaces, to fit either a specialized task, or the mechanical design of their end effector. While some non-planar sensors exist, they may require high fabrication cost [27,28] or large amounts of data for training the reconstruction models [29,30]. Unlike previous works, DTact can be extended with a non-planar surface while keeping the illumination condition and reconstruction algorithm the same as planar ones.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the method to compute depth maps can be re-used for the sensors with non-planar surfaces. Both of the two sensors achieve to reconstruct their surfaces by projecting the depth maps to the non-planar surfaces with ray casting algorithm [29]. The examples indicate that DTact can perform reconstruction even when the surface is non-planar, which usually require complex mechanical design or intricate reconstruction algorithms for other sensors.…”
Section: Non-planar Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the human tactile system, sensors using many different technologies have been proposed, in which a variety of functional sensing elements are integrated into the robot end-effector to provide the requisite feedback. Among them, camera-based tactile sensors [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] show certain advantages, among them super-high-resolution as each pixel from an image can be regarded as a "tactel" (tactile element), and ease of use as they use fewer cables than other capacitive-based, resistive-based, OFETs and OECTs tactile array sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%