2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density-Based Basis-Set Incompleteness Correction for GW Methods

Abstract: Similar to other electron correlation methods, manybody perturbation theory methods based on Green functions, such as the so-called GW approximation, suffer from the usual slow convergence of energetic properties with respect to the size of the one-electron basis set. This displeasing feature is due to the lack of explicit electron-electron terms modeling the infamous Kato electron-electron cusp and the correlation Coulomb hole around it. Here, we propose a computationally efficient density-based basis-set cor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter case the polarizability is obtained by the Adler-Wiser construction, which involves terms of a sum over all empty eigenstates. It is in principle exact for the RPA polarizability, but it is known to converge slowly and alternative schemes have been proposed [31][32][33]. The situation is quite different for the basis we use: quasiparticle levels converge very quickly with the rank of the basis set, as was shown in some detail for a number of semiconductors [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case the polarizability is obtained by the Adler-Wiser construction, which involves terms of a sum over all empty eigenstates. It is in principle exact for the RPA polarizability, but it is known to converge slowly and alternative schemes have been proposed [31][32][33]. The situation is quite different for the basis we use: quasiparticle levels converge very quickly with the rank of the basis set, as was shown in some detail for a number of semiconductors [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All our TD-DFT calculations have been performed with GAUSSIAN 16, 108 using the ultrafine quadrature grid. As the convergence with respect to the basis set size of vertical excitation energies stemming from density-based methods (such as TD-DFT) and wavefunction-based methods tend to significantly differ, [101][102][103] we have decided to perform the TD-DFT benchmarks with the aug-cc-pVQZ basis set (i.e., using the TBE/aug-cc-pVQZ values as references), which is likely large enough to be close to the CBS limit for both families of methods. We have selected the following XCFs to perform our calculations: two global hybrids with rather low exact exchange percentage, B3LYP (20%) 10,137-139 and PBE0 (25%), 11,12 one global hybrid with a much larger share of exact exchange, M06-2X (54%), 78 and five RSHs (CAM-B3LYP, 15 LC-HPBE, 140 B97X, 17 B97X-D, 141 and M11 142 ).…”
Section: Td-dft Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 46 , 96 , 97 Consequently, the last years have witnessed some effort to reduce time-to-solution further, which resulted in massively parallel implementations optimized for state-of-the-art supercomputers 98 , 99 but also in notable algorithmic developments, including stochastic approaches, 100 102 implementations avoiding the explicit summation over empty electronic states in the polarizability, P ( 103 106 ) low-rank approximations to the dielectric function ϵ 64 , 97 , 107 or the screened interaction W , 108 , 109 and basis set error (BSE) correction schemes. 110 112 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%