Density-dependency and plant-soil feedback: former plant abundance influences competitive interactions between two grassland plant species through plant-soil feedbacks

Abstract

Backgrounds and aimsNegative plant-soil feedbacks (PSFs) are thought to promote species coexistence, but most evidence is derived from theoretical models and data from plant monoculture experiments.MethodsWe grew Anthoxanthum odoratum and Centaurea jacea in field plots in monocultures and in mixtures with three ratios (3:1, 2:2 and 1:3) for three years. We then tested in a greenhouse experiment the performance of A. odoratum and C. jacea in pots planted with monocultures and 1:1 mixtures and filled with live and sterile soils collected from the field plots.ResultsIn the greenhouse experiment, C. jacea produced less aboveground biomass in soil conditioned by C. jacea monocultures than in soil conditioned by A. odoratum monocultures, while the aboveground biomass of A. odoratum in general did not differ between the two monospecific soils. The negative PSF effect was greater in the 1:1 plant mixture than in plant monocultures for A. odoratum but did not differ for C. jacea. In the greenhouse experiment, the performance of C. jacea relative to A. odoratum in the 1:1 plant mixture was negatively correlated to the abundance of C. jacea in the field plot where the soil was collected from. This relationship was significant both in live and sterile soils. However, there was no relationship between the performance of A. odoratum relative to C. jacea in the 1:1 plant mixture in the greenhouse experiment and the abundance of A. odoratum in the field plots.ConclusionsThe response of a plant to PSF depends on whether the focal species grows in monocultures or in mixtures and on the identity of the species. Interspecific competition can exacerbate the negative plant-soil feedbacks compared to intraspecific competition when a plant competes with a stronger interspecific competitor. Moreover, the abundance of a species in mixed plant communities, via plant-soil feedback, negatively influences the relative competitiveness of that species when it grows later in interspecific competition, but this effect varies between species. This phenomenon may contribute to the coexistence of competing plants under natural conditions through preventing the dominance of a particular plant species.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s11104-018-3690-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Temporal changes in plant–soil feedback effects on microbial networks, leaf metabolomics and plant–insect interactions

“…In general, except after 10 months of conditioning, J. vulgaris produced most biomass above‐ground and below‐ground in 100% sterilized soil and least in conspecific‐conditioned soil. Such better performance in sterile than in live soil has been reported in multiple studies (Joosten et al, 2009; Kos et al, 2015a; Wang et al, 2019; Xue et al, 2018). J. vulgaris has a negative conspecific feedback (e.g.…”

Are two strategies better than one? Manipulation of seed density and soil community in an experimental prairie restoration

“…However, these studies do not consider seeding density, and thus may be more comparable with the low‐density treatment. Recent papers, which consider plant competition together with plant–soil feedbacks, indicate that interspecific competition with a strong competitor increases negative feedback, and negative feedbacks can prevent dominance of strongly competitive plant species (Lekberg et al ; Xue et al ). Thus, the strong interspecific competition in the forb‐rich plots could lead to differing effects of soil biota on strong competitors like the seeded grasses.…”

Mechanisms of plant–soil feedback: interactions among biotic and abiotic drivers

“…Community structure should be less important for abundant species, as soil is likely to have been conditioned by conspecific individuals. This may magnify PSF by increasing the accumulation of soil biota or changes in nutrients (Kulmatiski et al ., ; Xue et al ., ), although the mechanism is unlikely to change. If these populations are genetically diverse, however, multiple PSF mechanisms can occur if individuals within the population vary in resource allocation (e.g.…”