1983
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(83)90198-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density-dependent forces and large-basis structure models in the analyses of 12C(p, p') reactions at 135 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present MGOP models are applied to total neutron cross sections. We show that the experimental data of 12 C, 40 Ca, 90 Zr, 184 W, 208 40 Ca, 56 Fe, 140 Cd, and 120 Sn systems at E n = 65-351.5 MeV. The experimental data for 16 O, 56…”
Section: ) Sec IV B Total Neutron Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present MGOP models are applied to total neutron cross sections. We show that the experimental data of 12 C, 40 Ca, 90 Zr, 184 W, 208 40 Ca, 56 Fe, 140 Cd, and 120 Sn systems at E n = 65-351.5 MeV. The experimental data for 16 O, 56…”
Section: ) Sec IV B Total Neutron Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…We calculate the SF potentials for the pA and nA systems with Z T = 6-92 and A T = 10-276 target nuclei at E = 50, 60,70,80,90,100,120,140,160,180,200,300, and 400 MeV. The parameter sets at other incident energies between 50 and 400 MeV are obtained by the spline interpolation.…”
Section: Functional Form Of Microscopic Global Optical Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other (p, p ′ ) analyses for the T =0 1 + state in the same en-ergy range the Love and Franey interaction [30] was employed for the effective interaction. It was found that the calculated cross sections overestimated the data by a factor of 2 at forward angles [23,24,31]. From the studies, however, the origin of the discrepancy could be identified neither in terms of the nuclear structure nor the effective interaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[46,47,39,41,48,42,43,49,50] for the 0 + → 2 + inelastic scattering, and Refs. [39,41,51,50] for the 0 + → 4 + inelastic scattering. Experimental error bars are omitted since they are small.…”
Section: Nucleusmentioning
confidence: 99%